Star Trek - The I.D.I.C. Epidemic

"Yer right,"  Beau said.  "Only..."  His voice trailed off.
She looked at him.  "What's the matter?"
"Well," he began.  "I can't - 'ere, maybe it's easier if I just show you."  He lifted his robe to reveal a long, angry gash along the length of his thigh.  T'Pina gasped involuntarily, her own pain forgotten.

Not a very inspired cover all told.
Not much of these three in it either...

I selected Jean Lorrah's second Star Trek book The I.D.I.C Epidemic (#38 Pocket, #7 Titan) in a strategic move to get rid of what I expected to be one of the weaker books in this selection of ten (#31 to #40) so I could enjoy the rest of them peacefully (ignoring Battlestations!), and because I knew that if The Vulcan Academy Murders are anything to go by this book should be quite easy going.

Now I can't answer to whether The I.D.I.C Epidemic is one of the weaker books or not yet (I suspect that expectation will still be proven correct) I can happily report that although Lorrah is at this time still lacking in a lot of areas as a writer, she has improved considerably since  she wrote The Vulcan Academy Murders.  I can't say anything as dramatic as 'you'd never know it was Lorrah', ultimately her girlish silliness is still there, her basic narrative formula stops prevents any kind of mystery, and her clumsy, overly simplistic science makes it difficult to accept the greatest medical minds were unable to come up with a solution to the problems presented.  I can say however that Lorrah has matured a great deal since The Vulcan Academy Murders, all aspects seem a lot tighter and better thought out in The I.D.I.C Epidemic and she does a considerably better job on her characterisations generally.  I think this may be partially to do with the fact that she uses the 'canon characters' very sparingly and concentrates more on developing her cast of original characters (and her versions of Sarek & Amanda).  Usually I wouldn't encourage this, but in the case of Lorrah her strength lies with developing her own cast of characters within the Star Trek universe as her grasp on existing characters is tentative.  She tends to bend characters to the narrative as opposed to having the narrative bend to the characters.

The I.D.I.C Epidemic follows directly on from the end of The Vulcan Academy Murders, so I guess if you were set on reading these two books, you may as well read them together and in that order.  Unfortunately, when Titan published these books they were published backwards and four books apart (TIE is #7 and TVAM is #12) which must have been confusing for readers at the time, especially because characters like Kirk, Spock, and McCoy are very minor characters and much of the story is building on characters and events of TVAM.  Lorrah says in her foreword that you can read these two books out of order because 'all the Star Trek novels are designed like episodes, so that it doesn't hurt to miss some or read them out of order'.  I think Lorrah is over estimating her own ability here (as she does in much of her foreword).  Her writing although much improved is not good enough to really make this a stand alone novel, not with her transplanting of characters which had significant development in her previous book but who aren't redeveloped or explained well in the second.  Having read TVAM I still had some difficulty following some of the characters until TIE jogged my memory enough about the previous book.

The I.D.I.C Epidemic starts rather slowly I feel, which contributed to me taking far too long to read it, the story didn't really become interesting to me until over half way through; once I reached that point however I finished it pretty quickly.

Nisus is an inter-species science colony, so inter-species in fact that there is even a Klingon representative (who turns out to be quite a decent main character) of the 'Final Reflection' mould, and Orions are also involved.  Being a colony, there are whole families there and within them, many mixed heritage children, the implication for much of the book is that the diversity of the people there and in particular the children has caused the terrible mutating plague.  It begins with introducing the plague, the Klingon main character and emphasising the mentality  / presence of the Orions.  Lorrah also introduces the strange additional peril of ice damaging turbines and spring melts potentially flooding the colony; this whole side story I find quite a strange inclusion to be honest and ultimately just adds more silliness and drama to the plot.

The Enterprise leaves Vulcan some time after the events of The Vulcan Academy Murders carrying Sendet and a band of aggressive Vulcans which are supposed to be delivered to a penal colony of some form.  Also on board are Sarek and Amanda (now recovered from their ordeals in TVAM) on their way to a diplomatic meeting and two more characters from TVAM Sorel, the Widowed Vulcan Healer and Daniel Corrigan, a human doctor who married Sorel's daughter after the events of TVAM.  Also included in this group are T'Kar a Vulcan nurse and widow, and her adopted daughter T'Pina who were to be returning to their home Nisus which is now coincidentally plague ridden.  You following?  Good.  

The plague itself is found to mutate within the bodies of mixed-species or hybrid individuals, creating various strains and sub-strains in both iron and copper based blooded persons.  The interest that arises in this is the reaction to the mixed heritage people by people on Nisus - and here is the peril - even if Nisus is saved, can it still continue and an inter-species colony if indeed the plague is proven to have been caused by their diversity?  The answer to this is that Lorrah decides to cop out from tackling this question and instead devises a work around so that it becomes apparent that the hybrid children and inter-species couples were not the cause of the development of the plague at all.  This of course makes the resolution of the story relatively simple since one point of friction is easily removed all together.

But really the whole idea of the plague is secondary to Lorrah, what she really wants is a stage for her modified Vulcans and inter-species couples whom she had developed extensively in fanzines  in the 1970s.  She has a particular love of Sarek and Amanda's relationship and has developed these characters in her fanfic writing.  I think this is why I felt (and I guess still feel) a disconnect when reading TVAM and TIE; Lorrah has developed this characters to such an extent in her own mind that they have changed significantly from their incarnations in the series.  I guess if you haven't read her fanzines then meeting these two characters in her novels can feel a little bit disjointed, if you see what I mean.  The same goes for Lorrah's Vulcans who I find are characterised a little strangely, but again I feel this is due to her own development of Vulcan culture... I think definitely influenced by her friend Lichtenberg and her Kraith series.

Lorrah wants to make sure her characters are happily paired off in the end.  Her Widower from TVAM is pared with her new main character's mother - a widow - and by the end of the book her new girl character (who ends up being a Romulan... yep just let it roll) is paired off with the charming and probably cockney (sigh) half Human-half Orion pirate son, 'looks human, bleeds green' Beau Deaver.

There isn't really too much more to this book, since it's really about showcasing these original characters and their thoughts and feelings and actions.  McCoy and Kirk appear every so often.  Amanda ends up ill and on the verge of death again.  Spock ends up ill and we very briefly hear a bit of angst from Kirk.  Uhura is a voice over the intercom and Scotty pops into the narrative a couple of times before going back to doing whatever he likes with the Enterprise engines.

A real weakness to this story however is the premise that medical personnel wouldn't be able to spot plague transmission vectors and a say, Klingon engineer would because he's not thinking like a medical professional but like an engineer.  Once you kind of pick up on how ridiculously simple the answer to the problem is and how silly it is to be so far in the future and apparently they still don't know how to deal with plague outbreaks... it somewhat breaks your suspension of disbelief.  If Lorrah had understood a little bit more from a medical perspective, perhaps it would have worked a little bit better.

Finally, I'd like to draw attention to Lorrah's foreword (N.B. In this case I read from the Titan edition) which has a couple of interesting points.  Firstly, she talks about the fandom, the Welcomitee and the Star Trek Offical Fan Club, she then moves on to drawing the reader's attention to fanzines (which of course she was heavily involved with and where she developed much of her Vulcan/Sarek/Amanda headcanon).  She also talks about how to pursue the lofty position of 'professional author', and perhaps... perhaps I should just quote this bit:

"They cannot collaborate with you, write the stories you want to tell (you'll have to do that yourself), or critique your novels (they're busy writing their own).  All authors though, are happy to receive comments about their books, and most will answer questions."

Now, it's all very reasonable... I guess, but the tone of this (and the rest of the foreword) just rubs me the wrong way.  It seems a strange thing to put into a foreword but then again, looking at her fanzine history (and her slightly strange demands/requests as part of that) I'm not incredibly surprised.  I get the feeling that Lorrah has a lot of ego, in some aspects deservedly, but in others...

I think that in her foreword she is writing in her 'academic' style.  I haven't read any of her academic writing, but I suspect it will read rather like the foreword.

Thing is, in my opinion the quality of the novel and her ability as I have experienced it doesn't really warrant the arrogance with which she writes.  In her academic / non-fiction writing she could well be brilliant, or even her short stories which she produced for fanzines could well be top notch but at the time this novel was produced she really isn't a very good novelist.

Which isn't to say the novels I've read from her aren't enjoyable per se.  The Vulcan Academy Murders was enjoyable because it was ridiculous even if the writing wasn't that good and The I.D.I.C Epidemic is similar in that it's so silly and saccharine at times you can't help but laugh.  So... depending on your taste, you might want to give The I.D.I.C Epidemic a go, certainly if you enjoyed Lorrah's previous book The Vulcan Academy Murders but equally if you just want a bit of light read with OC characters as a focus.  I think this is the last Star Trek TOS novel which was released with side characters / OCs as the main protagonists to the story; it might be worth reading just for that!

3/5 - Plague! Crashes!  Flash Floods! Romance! A nearly absent main cast! 

Sorry for the delay, although I'm feeling much better than before the operation I've been somewhat out of sorts!  Hopefully back to normal programming soon!

Star Trek - TimeTrap

Kirk's eyes were slowly growing accustomed to the light.  He squeezed them shut, forcing out the tears, and opened them again more slowly.  He had been right: he was surrounded by Klingons.

So Klanth had won.  Kirk realized immediately what must have happened.  Some of the Enterprise Security team had been knocked unconscious in the same way he had been, and the Klingons had been able to overpower the rest and take them prisoner.

There just hasn't been enough Kirk recently, I thought to myself.  I need more Kirk! This led me to jumping ahead to Time Trap (#40 Pocket, #11 Titan) (1988) by David Dvorkin.  It just happens that this was first released in June 1988 - it was released in the month I was born!

You might remember that David Dvorkin also wrote The Trellisane Confrontation which was released four years previously in 1984.  There are similarities in that 'the big bads' are the Klingons, the story is quite small in scope, and although Kirk is treated as a main character (yay!) Dvorkin finds something that he can criticise him for (boo!). 

I actually enjoyed Time Trap quite a bit, even if at alternate times I had this super anxiety and periods of utter annoyance.  Mostly it had to do with Kirk's characterization, some of which is explained away but I do just think that Dvorkin wants to punish Kirk somehow and it's not kinky either!!

Anyway Time Trap uses the events of the episode The Tholian Web to explain the strange phenomena that Kirk and his crew encounter.  While on route to a Starbase for some much needed R&R they pick up a distress signal from the boarders of Tholian space.  Naturally the Enterprise investigates the distress signal and finds that it is coming from a Klingon ship which appears to be breaking apart in the center of an unknown spacial disturbance.  The Klingons refuse aid, but Kirk wants to know what they are doing on the boarders of Tholian and Federation space and decides to lead a security team to board the Klingon ship in order to take the commander prisoner.  They beam onto the crippled ship, but almost immediately the ship takes catastrophic damage and the human boarding party and the Klingon crew are incapacitated.  In the meantime, the ship disappears from Enterprise's sensors and Uhura is suddenly rendered unconscious at her station from an apparent electric shock.  Enterprise itself is attacked by the strange phenomenon, crippling it.  Spock follows orders from Starfleet to leave the area and proceed to the nearest star base for repairs, much to disappointment of the crew who want to look for their captain.  Spock suspects that all isn't as it seems and proceeds with his own research.

Kirk however finds himself injured and surrounded by Klingons, but these Klingons are different from those he is used to dealing with.  He is told that a temporal phenomenon has resulted in him being thrown one hundred years into the future, where peaceful 'New Klingons' are the main faction in the Klingon Empire and have brokered peace with the Federation.  The 'New Klingons' are charming and scholarly and Kirk easily becomes friendly with them; this is especially true of a female Klingon who is a historian and who hero worships Kirk - Kalrind.  They quickly become lovers and Kirk finds himself utterly besotted.  However health problems continue to plague Kirk, as he often finds himself often collapsing and weak.

Another scholarly Klingon -Morith- explains to Kirk that he is needed to join these 'New Klingons' on a trip back in time in order to ensure that the 'Great Peace' come to pass.  On 'returning to the past' it is revealed that everything isn't as it appears.  An elaborate plot is revealed involving Klingon sleeper agents and an attack on the heart of the Federation - Earth, by Klingons pretending to be part of a peace fleet.  Kirk himself is dying from injuries sustained on boarding the Klingon vessel caught in the disturbance, and the Klingons that were drugged -including Kalrind- are returning to their original selves and it is revealed Spock's research paid off, as it was a massive cloaking device.  The Klingons are sent packing and McCoy puts Kirk back together again.

One of the things my partner said when I tried to explain Time Trap to him was that it sounded a lot more like a scheme that the Romulans would have come up with as opposed to the Klingons.  I kind of agree that it does seem a little too scheming for the Klingons we know, unless of course you take into account the Klingons from The Final Reflection and Dvorkin directly references parts of The Final Reflection, so I think we can safely say that this book fits in with that continuity and idea of the Klingons.

What I really liked in Time Trap was the 'time travel' aspect of it - not that there was any ultimately, it was all a trick, but I did like the thought that had gone into creating a believable scenario for both Kirk and the reader.  I liked how they gradually revealed the time travel scenario, and how because I knew that ultimately the Klingon Empire and the Federation would be at peace (and this is after the start of TNG) I could believe it.  I also managed to rationalise out Kirk's periods of weakness and illness, putting it down to 'oh it's because he's out of his own time, so that's why he'll need to go back to the Enterprise in the end', because I know I've read something like that before.  When Dvorkin used the time travel theory that they would succeed in going back in time because it had already happened, it was believable.  Kirk believed it too, so.. it all makes sense... right?  But all the while, you're thinking about a couple of new characters that have been introduced... and Spock's research, what is Spock's theory?  Why did Uhura scream and keel over before the Enterprise was attacked by the 'cloud' in space?

I didn't like Kirk's relationship with Kalrind however.  It made me roll my eyes, really Dvorkin, you're going to play up to that aspect of Kirk's personality?  Initially, I thought that Kalrind of an interesting character, as a 'New Klingon' she was likeable and the backstory (forward story?) she gave about what it was like in this future was kind of strange but believable.  I liked that she had this aspect of idol worship to her... I didn't like that the first time Kirk and Kalrind spent any time together at all they kissed and probably a bit more!  I think I was more angry that Kalrind ended up just being the  girlfriend than anything else.  She was interesting as an academic and really sweet, and it would have been fun to have a bit more to their relationship before they end up as an item.  To a certain extent Kirk's malleability and Kalrind's personality are all explained away as both of them are drugged - Kalrind has even been 'reprogrammed' herself to act the way she does.

I particularly liked McCoy's characterization, it was just right.  He wasn't the focus, but he was there in the same capacity as he was in the show and not sidelined by the author.  McCoy had quite a big role to play as regards the exposition of plot and making it clear that Kirk was actually dying from internal injuries and had been cured by medicines from the future.  Anyway, since there has been a Leonard drought recently, I was very happy to see him with an active role in the plot.

Spock was... how many male author's choose to characterize him, although Dvorkin is a little more sympathetic and makes him slightly more than a talking computer.  In an effort to keep the mystery alive, Dvorkin doesn't give any insight to Spock's thoughts which, yes keeps you guessing somewhat however this could also have been achieved with changes to the narrative structure.

Time Trap was a little convoluted at times, which could have been solved with a bit of creative restructuring but on the whole it's a relatively easy and enjoyable read.  I rather enjoyed being fooled as to the direction the plot was going (because, lets face it I tried to meta the story and for once it didn't work!) and for that reason alone I'd recommend it!

There are lots of little scenes which are written rather well, and are worth reading the book for in my opinion, although for those who like a bit more introspection in their characters it might seem a little dry.  I'm going to give Time Trap the same score as The Trellisane Confrontation - 3/5 - because although I feel there has been an improvement to Dvorkin's writing between the novels, I don't think it is really enough to warrant giving it a higher score.  If you liked his previous book though, you will probably like this one.

3/5 - what a fabulous monobrow... I see Boris is no longer the artist?

Star Trek - Dwellers in the Crucible

Some small part of her mind marvelled at the words that came out of her mouth.  She who had been known for the quality of her silences was transformed by her own rootlessness and her need to save one other.

Kaiidth! She would bargain with the Klingon and she would win, though the winning kill her.  The crucible of the t'hy'la could also immolate. 

Dwellers in the Crucible (#25 Pocket, Giant #2 Titan) (1985) by Margaret Wander Bonanno is very much the spiritual successor of its two cited inspirations The Final Reflection by John M Ford, and My Enemy, My Ally by Diane Duane.  Not only does Bonanno use the concepts of the Klingon and Rihannsu (Romulan) empires explored in Ford and Duane's respective novels, but she also minimises the impact of the Enterprise crew and characters, instead telling a story where the cast we know are incidental and two original characters take the fore.

I have to admit, I initially skipped over this one because I thought it wouldn't be an easy read, especially if it did follow in the footsteps of The Final Reflection and My Enemy, My Ally.  Truth be told, I was right, however the two mentioned instalments turned out to be fantastic, so what was I worried about? 

Margaret Wander Bonanno was already a professionally published author having penned three novels previous to Dwellers in the Crucible.  She is a talented writer and her previous experience in world crafting and character development is clear from the outset of Dwellers and her previous independence leads her to create an adventure within the Star Trek universe, using lore from other successful authors, but outside of the usual tinted lens of the Enterprise and her crew.

However, however, although Dwellers in the Crucible has the pedigree: good material, talented writer, good characters, it doesn't have the illusive something, that little bit of stardust which would elevate it into something (in my opinion) great.

Have you ever read The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro?  There's a film of it too starring Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson.  It's a very clever book; cleverly written, a sad character analysis with a sad, hopeless ending.  It's a prize winner, a literary masterpiece - it is also one of the most dull, unrewarding, uninspiring books I have ever read.  It's a lesson in drudgery, of patience and dogged determination, AND frankly if a reader manages to get through it on their own steam they should reward themselves (a slice of cake will do) because you get not a jot from the book.  The film isn't much better, brilliant but good grief I shall not watch that exercise in dreary fatalism again!

Why have I told you about The Remains of the Day?  Well.. Dwellers in the Crucible elicits the same feelings from me.  I love the fact Bonanno knows how to write, I love that it's a 'quality' book, I like it's cleverness, it's structural peculiarities, I like the different focus.  I also think it is rather unrewarding and often painfully dull.  I can't truthfully call it bad (it simply isn't), but I also can't say I enjoyed it (because I didn't).  I'm glad I read Dwellers but on the other hand I had to force myself to pick it back up; the experience can probably be summed up as all stick and no carrot.

The Story

Dwellers in the Crucible is a story of captivity, friendship and survival of powerless civilians.  It's not a pleasure to read; it is heavy going and often hard to continue.  It contains torture, sadism, murder and suicide, but also loyalty, self sacrifice, compassion and love.

The Federation has adopted an initiative based on an ancient Vulcan practice - The Warrantors of Peace - an important person or people to the current world leaders are held hostage with a capsule embedded in their hearts which will detonate if removed or if the planet commits an act of war/violence on another.  The concept boils down to the threat mutually assured destruction should one planet commit an act of violence toward another (an agreeable cold war?).

The Romulans and Klingons in their uneasy alliance, formulate a plan to kidnap a number of Warrantors in order to destabilise the peace of the Federation.  Once the Romulans kidnap the Warrantors they are passed into the hands of the Klingons (frankly a terrible idea on the part of the Romulans) who amuse themselves by torturing their civilian charges whom they have under their control for about six months.

Meanwhile the Enterprise is on 'standby'.  Sulu is dressed up as a Romulan and sent undercover in the Empire (which we barely hear about), Scotty gathers information from the Klingons, and Uhura sets about sowing incorrect information for the Romulan listeners to decipher.  Kirk... well Admiral Kirk is getting rather agitated about the whole thing, while Spock keeps him company?

Eventually the remaining Warrantors are saved, and Kirk and Spock see a reflection of themselves in the two women.  The Federation finally decides this whole 'Warrantors of Peace' concept was a terrible, terrible idea and is in the process of scrapping the whole program by the end of the book.

The overarching story isn't at all well developed.  Some reviewers have had a problem with the 'Warrantors of Peace', however the Federation is capable of doing remarkably stupid things so I can give it a pass... plus the Vulcans suggested it so I can conceivably imagine the Federation diplomats and higher ups agreeing it was a good idea.  Other problems include the under developed Sulu mission which could have been a book all by itself, Admiral Nogura's strange decisions about what Kirk should or shouldn't be doing, and the fact that the Enterprise is left idling for six months.  I imagine Kirk was climbing the walls!  However, Dwellers in the Crucible is not concerned with 'the big picture', but with the relationships between the Warrantors, and the Warrantors and their captors.

The Crucible(s)

The term crucible in the title applies to different aspects of the story, but is most strongly summed up in the following quote:

The Vulcan friendship mode is a crucible.  There is that in it which can purify, refine, strengthen.  There is also that which can immolate, destroy.

Just remove the reference to 'the Vulcan friendship mode' (I really hate the 'mode' terminology since Vulcan Command Mode) and replace it with 'love'.  Love is the crucible.  Poignantly this novel is set between TMP and TWOK, and in TMP love is the word which is never mentioned except in euphemism.  In Dwellers, love of the same flavour as Kirk and Spock's is explored - t'hy'la - through the guise of two women, Cleante al-Faisal - a human female, and T'Shael - a Vulcan female. 

However, love isn't the only crucible in Dwellers, although it is the most poetic.  There are several events which act as crucibles, some are in the novel's 'present' others in the characters' pasts.  The shared pasts of Cleante and T'Shael (which is a significant portion of the book) highlights moments of change which would eventually lead them to the realisation of their status of t'hy'la.  Some of the moments of dramatic, others are moments of understanding for one, or both of them.

I think the most obvious 'crucible' is their prison on the abandoned planetoid - certainly a place which can purify, refine, strengthen or immolate and destroy.  The situation as engineered by the Klingons (or specifically Kalor) causes the deaths of the three Deltans.  The Deltans lived for love both physical and mental however in the crucible that love destroyed them.  On the other hand, the pressure felt by Cleante and T'Shael to save the other caused both of them to be forged into something better both as individuals and as a unit.

Cleante & T'Shael

Cleante and T'Shael are Kirk and Spock's stand ins respectively.

What makes it quite interesting however is that Cleante and T'Shael are civilians and come from very different backgrounds to Kirk and Spock.  I think it would be interesting to speculate what changes there would be to this story if they weren't civilians or if it was Kirk and Spock in this same situation... No doubt there there is a fanfiction on this subject somewhere.

I can't talk too much about the characters without giving away too much of their story.  However Cleante is very much an impulsive, young, human woman with altogether too much pride; T'Shael is a reticent, reserved young fully Vulcan woman who is humble and 'known for the quality of her silences'.  Both women come from less than ideal families, Cleante's mother never affectionate and work driven while T'Shael's parents are dead - her uncaring mother died on the Intrepid while her father died of an incurable wasting disease.  However, both women are incredibly lonely and this loneliness brings them together despite their difference.  I think this is also what is brings Kirk and Spock together initially, command is a lonely place.

I think it interesting that although Cleante and T'Shael are the analogues of Kirk and Spock, that they are not copies.  T'Shael is humble however Spock has great pride (as I think most Vulcans do), while Cleante is prideful while Kirk will lower himself for the greater good.  These differences in both relationships evaporate however when they are truly 'bonded' and when the other is in danger both pairs gain the capacity for great self sacrifice.

I think perhaps most women will find something of themselves in either or both Cleante and T'Shael, perhaps that's what made their situation (their captivity and torture) so horrible to read about.  It's much easier to read about the appalling treatment of a male hero character; it's not so close to home and you know that the hero character is trained for this and they can handle it.  In Cleante and T'Shael's situation you don't have any of that reassurance, you're wondering when they are going to break.  I think it's most galling because you can't even put your trust in Vulcan fortitude, you're wondering when T'Shael will break too, not just the highly strung human.

Ford's Klingons and Duane's Romulans

To me it seems odd to set out to use existing lore by other novel writers and then use so little of it that it almost seems wasteful to have considered it in the first place.  Although there are nods to Ford and Duane's ideas, the Klingons and the Romulans remain more Bonanno's creations that the other writers.

Ford's Klingons were sly gamemasters, and if a Klingon should rise through the ranks from a lowly background you'd expect them to be intelligent - not so apparently.  Krazz is one of the more stupid villains despite his rise to a position of power.  Ford spent much of his novel The Final Reflection giving a different reading of the Klingons, trying to find common ground that perhaps even Kirk could in some way empathise with.  However Krazz and Kalor (Krazz's second in command) are simply exactly like you expect a Klingon to be - and to be honest, if I were Kirk the actions of Krazz and Kalor would have closed me down to any possible positive feelings towards the Klingon species.  Kalor is the worst of the two, a cruel sadist who engineers the deaths of the three Deltans under the premise of science.  Lets face it, if he was a 'scientist' doing experiments on rabbits and enjoying causing them suffering, you wouldn't want to know him right?  Ok, well now apply that to three Deltans, one of which is a child.  No Bonanno, he can't have my sympathy now that he's found he has a soft side now that he's coerced Cleante into sex in order to save her friend from his sadistic experiments.  Nor am I going to listen to Cleante when she starts sympathising with him as her mind is breaking.  His 'redemption' came too late in the game, I think he's a poor representation of Ford's Klingons.

Duane's Romulans / Rihannsu are represented a little better perhaps, but this may be because we don't see them half as much.  Bonanno seems to have used some key points from Duane's Romulan development like the term Rihannsu, and the imagery associated with the Praetor / Empire.  Much of what could have been included regarding the Romulans (and perhaps there was more in the first draft) would have been Sulu's adventure undercover in the Romulan Empire,  but since this is barely touched once introduced (and consequently the results of the investigation is only a confirmation of what they already know - they would have gone to the same place without confirmation anyway), so it isn't really important in the long run.  I found it interesting that one of the main plot points to Duane's story My Enemy, My Ally is that the female Romulan/Rihannsu Commander whom Spock tricks in order to get the cloaking device is disgraced and sent into exile,  however in Bonanno's iteration she still has the favour of the Praetor - surely this is a major change to Rihannsu thought?

All in all, I don't think Bonanno uses enough Ford and Duane's ideas to have really warranted her giving them credit at the beginning, although... there is mild influence.  I don't think the representation of either species is bad though, don't get me wrong.

Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Uhura, Sulu, Scotty

Odd.  Just Odd.

I don't know whether it's because Bonanno is doing her best to keep them out of the limelight, but the established characters are often a little 'off'.  Out of all of them, I'd say that Scotty and Uhura have the most true to form characterisation.  Uhura certainly feels like she's presented similarly as in other novels (although some of her dialogue with Spock is a little saccharine), while I could vividly see Scotty on his mission in my minds eye - shame it was so short.

Sulu was... out the way for much of the novel, doing something simultaneously important and unimportant, which ultimately didn't lead anywhere.  It was kind of annoying really as for once I wanted to know what Sulu was actually doing (my dislike for Takei unfortunately bleeds into my feelings for Sulu) as his mission was the most dynamic of the lot.

Kirk, Spock and McCoy only really get going in the final section of the novel when we're beaten with the t'hyla stick - but frankly if you hadn't got that Bonanno has made a parallel couple out of Cleante and T'Shael in order to investigate the depths of the concept of T'hy'la whilst circumventing the radars of certain audiences then perhaps you deserve it.

No need to open her eyes this time.  What little strength she had left she raised one hand.  It was gently embraced by two human hands, and T'Shael's pain receded in the emanation of love from those hands.

Did she dare smile? If death were to claim her before she could let Cleante know the depth of her gratitude, her yes - call it love - even in the presence of strangers -

For the first time in her life, T'Shael smiled.

"I'm here," was all Cleante said, and it was all that was needed.

Jim Kirk looked at Spock, who acknowledged the scene in silence before setting the controls (...). 

Sound familiar by any chance?  It's pretty much a verbatim rendition of Spock and Kirk's scene in TMP.  This book is also set between TMP and TWOK... Whodathunk.

McCoy knows everything, and even when Kirk is being dense he makes sure to hit him with the t'hy'la hammer:

"(...): whatever happens to her depends in large part on Cleante.  And vice versa."

Kirk gave him a puzzled look.

"Explain." 

 "Oh, come on Jim!  You've seen it as well as I have, and so has Spock.  These two are forged together for life.  They're almost a mirror image of you and Spock, both of them falling over each other in self sacrifice.  There's an old phrase in Latin - amicus usque ad aras. 'A friend in spite of all differences; a friend to the last extremity.'  There's even a Vulcan word for it, isn't there Spock?"

"The word, Doctor is t'hy'la," Spock murmured, ignoring McCoy's obtuseness.

There is also a section where McCoy leads Cleante away and sees the same look of devotion in her face as he had seen so many times in Jim Kirk's.  McCoy's role here is very much to draw attention to the parallel couples and I guess his character development / exposition is the depth of his understanding of his two closest friends.

So regarding Kirk and Spock... sure they have only a small part to play in this novel ultimately, but despite this the novel is about them or at least their relationship.  Nobody really cares about a couple of one off characters who disappear into the ether at the end of a novel, not really - what do they change ultimately?  Well nothing at all except perhaps our understanding of the term t'hy'la and the personal transformations which take place in a relationship of that depth.

While thinking about Dwellers and the concept of the 'crucible' and forging an unbreakable bond, I thought... when was the point that where at least one of them realised he was bound to the other?  When was Kirk and Spock's 'crucible' moment?  I thought about it for a while, but certainly Spock's 'moment' had to be Amok Time; I think that would be the time he realised he was bound to this human for life (that smile when he realises that Kirk is still alive...).  What about Kirk?  Well... like Cleante I think Kirk innately knew and recognised the other part of his soul, perhaps he didn't think about it in poetic terms until later, but from Kirk's reactions and the way he looks at Spock from the beginning (aided by Shatner's phenomenal acting), I think he knew all along.

So yes ultimately Dwellers in the Crucible is a very good, well thought out character study.  A little bit subversive, a lotta bit clever - I would recommend reading it for the questions it asks and for the thoughts it provokes.  However it is not an enjoyable book, I didn't take a lot of pleasure in reading it and it was at times a chore to read which is not a feeling I like.  I did feel like I was forcing myself to turn the pages, so this leaves me in a strange position.

I didn't like the book, but I liked the points it made and the questions it evoked... which is why I'm going to give it 3/5!

Star Trek - Mindshadow

She turned sideways in order to face Kirk directly.

"You have requested a replacement, haven't you, Captain?"  She looked from the surprise on the captain's face to McCoy, whose eyes were downcast.  "Perhaps you haven't been told the true extent of Spock's injuries."

"Are you telling me Spock will not return to duty?"  Kirk's jaw tightened so much it ached.

Her eyes were sympathetic but unyielding in their honesty.  "That's one possibility.  The best we can hope for is that it will be months before Spock is able to return to duty again."

Mindshadow (#27 Pocket, #41 Titan) (1986) is J M Dillard's first flirtation with novel writing and I guess, how she got 'outed' as a Trekker to her husband whom she had been keeping in the dark about her obsession by surreptitiously acquiring and reading published Star Trek novels.  She even wrote Mindshadow secretly and sent it off without anyone else reading it (Starlog - Issue 125).

I like the cover this time...
It's kind of clever...

I've previously reviewed Bloodthirst, Dillard's third Star Trek novel and I went back and cribbed it before I started this review.  In some ways Dillard improved between Mindshadow and Bloodthirst, but the weaknesses that reared their heads here in Mindshadow are still strongly affecting her work in later Star Trek instalments.

I'm happy I get to use a new term I picked up (from Joan Verba) to describe Mindshadow - it is to a certain extent a 'get'em' story and for once it's a 'get Spock' story instead of a 'get cinnamon roll Kirk' story.  Spock suffers a devastating injury to the left side of his head after falling down a cliff while investigating strange tricorder readings on a beautiful garden planet with technophobic inhabitants which pirates have been raiding.  The Federation has been asked to help these people protect their world and way of life however this all goes awry when the attacks do not come from above, but from below.  

Spock's recovery is not certain and McCoy sends for a specialist in Vulcan neurology to ensure his best chances.  When she comes (a petite, small, woman... doctor... very talented... excellent at hand to hand combat... everyone loves her - I'm sure I've seen this character before...) it soon becomes clear to the reader (if not the characters...) that she's not what she appears.  Unfortunately, the Federation's success depends on Spock regaining his memory and solving the mystery on Aritani, but his recovery is slow and he's dogged by saboteurs, who even go as far as slitting his wrists...

Kirk however can't just sit and wait for Spock to possibly recover, he must continue to act without his first officer, but every move he makes is countered and he soon comes to realise that he has a traitor on board when a captured Romulan pirate is killed in the brig, and unauthorised transmissions are being sent from somewhere on the ship.  Members of his crew are killed on Aritani in a devastating attack, and Scotty is framed as a murderer!

IN ADDITION to all this, McCoy has fallen in love with the new doctor - Emma Saenz - and she with him... but she also rather fancies Kirk... and he her... and everything goes terribly sour.

Kirk also has to ferry diplomats to Vulcan, which of course results in murder and general mayhem.

AND Spock ends up going home to Vulcan in order to get well again, meets another hybrid, faces an assassination attempt, gets framed with murder and gets his wrists slit... again.

To conclude the Enterprise returns to Aritani, Kirk gets the Romulan treatment (because who doesn't like Kirk with pointy ears... aside from Spock!) and things end with a bang!

I think you'll probably agree that there's a lot going on there and to be honest there are far too many things going on for a 250 page paperback.

I mean, it's a very sweet book in that there is some serious passion and love for Star Trek there... but it does feel like Dillard is trying to write her favourite episodes into her book, she's trying to do everything at once and the novel suffers for it.  For example, she obviously really liked Kirk getting pointy ears and Spock making disparaging comments about it, so that went in.  She also liked Journey to Babel, as she somehow manages to fit in the Enterprise collecting diplomats and even a murder!  I think for every element there is an analogue in the original series, and there are a lot of elements.

Characterisation is variable and my biggest disappointment was probably due to there being too much going on and too few pages to do it in.  I was all geared up for some touching K&S, you know the unbreakable friendship on the cusp of being broken because Spock would possibly never be 'Spock' again.  It looked like it was going to happen, I would be indulged and my heartstrings pulled in that bittersweet way that makes fangirls swoon... but... time passed, Spock got marginally better and the scene was never written... and Kirk apparently stopped visiting so much.  The hinted mental link?  Not really used.  Kirk knowing that Spock even in his mentally compromised state wouldn't try to kill himself - well he gave Spock the benefit of the doubt.

But where was that marvellous scene I was waiting for?!
It didn't happen.

Reunion after Vulcan...
Didn't really happen there either.

To be fair though, although I didn't see the emotional scene I was waiting for, I did get Spock related cinnamon roll Kirk angst, where Kirk didn't sleep for two days and was an irritable sod because Spock was in critical condition.  I suppose I can be appeased that way.  Plus there is quite a lot of emphasis on the 'love' between the trinity, the friendship, which I think thematically ties in well (especially with the movies...).

Characters at time seemed to be hit with ISS (inexplicable stupidity syndrome) quite regularly, including McCoy who apparently couldn't tell that Emma Saenz was Romulan... I mean come on.  Her body temperature was Vulcan high, she didn't sweat in high temperatures... and she was really strong... I don't think you can even put it down to building muscle from being on a high gravity planet...  McCoy has sexy times with her and still doesn't realise she isn't human!

Kirk was quite well characterised I think, although he did seem emotionally neutered at times... I do think we could have done without his attraction to Emma Saenz and the little love triangle that developed between Saenz, McCoy, and Kirk.  Or perhaps it was just an indication that Kirk has a preference for lovers with pointy ears (hohoho... I'm kidding, I'm kidding)?!

There was one particular bit concerning Scotty which made me quite annoyed.  It was his reaction to Kirk when her thought that Kirk had talked about his feelings over one of his engineers being killed.  His disrespect and jumping to conclusions about his captain did not sit right with me.  Again, it was a story element that didn't need to be there.

As for the original characters, there were two of note.  Firstly of course Emma Saenz, who at times is well constructed and at others utterly frustrating.  She's an interesting character, but because Dillard drops the reader lots of not-so-subtle hints rather early about her identity she's a little too transparent.  If Dillard had chosen to reveal her a little later it would have worked significantly better.  I was confused at one point about her position as a double agent and Admiral Komack's insistence of keeping Kirk in the dark,  I don't really see what her purpose was in her double agent role when she was on the Enterprise?  What benefit could she have been to the Romulans then?  It's a little bit contrived, why couldn't Spock recover, why did it have to be her?  Why couldn't they have just used another doctor?

The other character is Lieutenant Tomson, who appears in more books by Dillard and I think in one or two by other authors too.  Tomson is... infuriating but in a very fallible way... She isn't overused which is a good thing but unfortunately is involved in the erroneous murder charged levelled at Scotty.  This and the murder of one of the diplomats seem to be engineered so that Tomson can do something...  But as I've mentioned before, those elements could have been left out entirely.

Oh!  There's also Spock's replacement Varth...who is a nonentity...

The conclusion of the novel is a little weak and more than a little rushed, which could have been avoided if Dillard had kept the story a little more simple and done some serious editing.  Personally I would have cut out a lot of the superfluous bits of story in the middle and extended finale, given more details of the complex, more details of the Romulans, made more of the adventure and of Kirk and Spock working together again at the end.  As it was it ends up being a little bit flat, not terrible just a little lacklustre.

I did enjoy this book however.  Dillard proves that she can write characters well and she's especially good at dialogue, but her narrative structure is messy and she makes far too much of linking the events in the novel with events in the series and the animated series (of course, it isn't worse than Marshak and Culbreath actually footnoting all their references).

I'm going to be nice however and give Mindshadow a generous 3/5 - since a two would be overly stingy since it was a frustrating pleasure to read.

Star Trek - The Tears of the Singers

"Wait," Maslin said, eyeing her curiously.  "You're not like these vapid socialites.  What are you?"

She found it odd that he asked her what rather than who she was, but she ignored it, and answered, "I'm a Star Fleet officer assigned to U.S.S. Enterprise."

"Impressive, if one happens to be awed by that institution.  But what's a technocrat like you doing at one of my concerts, Madam Star Fleet?"

The Tears of the Singers (1984) (#19 Pocket, #39 Titan) was Melinda Snodgrass' first published novel.  Snodgrass would later become a prolific writer and still writes today under both her own name and pen names.  Snodgrass notably wrote the script for for TNG's The Measure of a Man, which was nominated for the Writer's Guild Award for outstanding writing in a drama series.

The Tears of the Singers is overall a good book.  It's well conceived and hints at the brilliant writer Snodgrass would become, however, it does regularly hiccup and suffer from an occasional heavy handedness which becomes a little wearisome.  Pacing is also a problem throughout this novel, which could be a symptom of Snodgrass' immaturity as a writer and her difficulty in writing the quantity of characters she does.  Her writing also suffers somewhat from a certain 'blandness', and it's unfortunate that she should use a character concept similar to characters in  Diane Duane's The Wounded Sky - when compared to Duane's colourful language, Snodgrass' falls short.

And that all sounds very negative I know, but I needed to get it out of my system first.

Saying all that, I need to stress that The Tears of the Singers isn't a bad book, however unlike The Wounded Sky or The Final Reflection it doesn't shine as bright.  When Snodgrass writes well, it's inspired and she can get the image or the characterisation across quickly and easily... succinctly I guess?  Her characterisations are generally good, although at times a little cliched, and she does paint fine scenes with her words.  Her approach is a little formulaic and almost a 'tick box' Star Trek novel, but that might work in her favour a little bit as it keeps the plot moving though it makes it rather predictable all told.

Ah... the reason perhaps that I'm struggling here is because every time I think of something complimentary, I can think of two or three other things that really let the book down, and that is so frustrating!

The 'Singers' are pretty much these...

The Tears of the Singers is a thinly veiled eco-fable at heart, which is drawing particularly on the practice of seal clubbing - a particularly revolting 'hunt' (if you can even call it that) where men go out on the ice and club seals to death (or not, in some cases), in order to acquire meat and an unbroken pelt, sometimes under the guise of 'conservation'.  The first major protests against the practice can be seen as far back as 1967, and in 1983 the EU (European Union) banned the import of white coat harp seal pup pelts (pelts from pups under two weeks of age).  More recently (2009) the EU has banned the import of all seal products, causing the value of pelts to fall from $100 to between $8 and $15 each.

Why would I go into all that?  Well, aside from standing on my soapbox, it's because the crux of The Tears of the Singers is that hunters have been killing a seal like creature for the tears they shed at the moment of death, which solidify into gems which have become popular throughout the Federation with the wealthy... and you'd have to be wealthy since the small number of gems available fetch extortionate prices.  These creatures were deemed non-intelligent during a survey and thus are fair game to hunters greedy for easy money.  However we find out during the course of the novel that the survey of the planet and the Taygetians was cursory at best and that the creatures are in fact a people, devoted to singing a hymn of salvation for their people, bending time and space to protect their planet.  The hunters disrupt their song by killing the adults which causes their song to become discordant, causing a rift in space time, the rift of course is what causes Star Fleet to send the Enterprise to investigate the anomaly.

This however, is not the whole story.  Since this is a boarder planet between the Federation and Klingon space, the Klingons have also noticed the anomaly and sent two ships to investigate.  It just so happens that the leader of expedition is Kor, the same Kor as involved in the incident with the Organians.  Kor, it turns out, is having trouble with mutineers (even with a loyal captain on the second Klingon ship), who disagree with his more peaceful, co-operative approach.  Kor recognises Klingon shortcomings and realises that working with Kirk and his scientists would be the only way to solve the problem of this dangerous phenomenon.  Eventually however, the Klingons act predictably and mutiny causing trouble for the Enterprise and the Klingon officers.

The romantic sub-plot concerns Uhura and a mercurial musical genius Mozart Maslin.  Although it is nice to see Uhura take a more active, almost 'lead' role for the first time in the Pocket Books series, this narrative thread is also one of the most irritating.  Essentially Mozart Maslin is drafted in to help the Enterprise solve the musical conundrum of the singers, he's not happy with it and is generally bad tempered, and egotistical.  Somehow, Uhura falls in love with this particularly irritating little man, who also conveniently (from a narrative perspective) happens to be quite ill, and this final musical problem will be his requiem.  I suppose love doesn't have to be sensible, but not unlike the abominable JJ movie Uhura, love makes her stupid and disobedient.  Now, I'm no 'feminist' (let's settle for egalitarian, shall we? This is not up for debate), and my reaction will generally be 'suck it up buttercup' as opposed to some sort of militant defence or righteous outrage, but it frustrates me that you can have a template like Uhura and still mess up characterisation!  I mean, I can almost forgive a male author for cocking up a female character, but it's just mystifying how a woman can write Uhura as a main character and make her into a... a.... spineless, gooey, love struck fool of a woman who lashes out at her captain for doing the right thing.  That isn't the Uhura we know!  Well, the lack of professionalism, foolish, prissy little girl character sums up the JJ Uhura, but not the TOS Uhura!

Now, perhaps this wouldn't be so bad if there wasn't a balancing female representative on the Klingon vessels, but there is... Kor's wife.  Unfortunately, she isn't characterised successfully either, in fact, the way she's written actually emphasises the problems with Uhura's characterisation.  The Klingon romantic subplot isn't too much better.  Kali (Kor's new, young, wife) is... essentially a go-between, a bridge between the Klingon parties and the Federation representatives, but she serves more to highlight Kor's abnormality than a character in her own right, though she does have her moments.  I was a little disappointed that Snodgrass decided to make her a 'strong because of love' type character as opposed to 'strong because capable' (which she doesn't seem to be).  She does redeem herself near the end of the book however and saves the Enterprise contingent, which was a relief.

I've already mentioned Uhura's flaws as regards to her role in the romance sub-plot, but how does she react on her own?  Unfortunately, Maslin is by necessity introduced very early and Uhura's character is basically represented and expanded on via her relationship with Maslin.  Instead of being Madam Starfleet and doing her job as an officer, she quickly degenerates into Maslin's tag-along.  She serves a purpose, sure, she is the only one who can get Maslin to listen, and she looks after him because of his ailing health, although by the end she is also redundant in this way.  Maslin does change, he understands and listens to Kirk and the other officers and his health deteriorates beyond the point of no return.   Uhura caught in the throws of love forgets duty, her dreams, her discipline, her ability as an officer in order to take the typically female role of carer, mother, empathic.  I don't think she really even truly contributes to the work of deciphering the language of the seal people, Maslin and Spock do most of the work.  While I don't begrudge a woman being caring, emotional, and/or in love, I really didn't enjoy Uhura's characterisation in this as she just became a little too malleable and didn't seem to retain enough of what I would consider herself in her interactions with other characters.

Maslin, otherwise known as Mozart is an insufferable character who gets some character growth but overall makes you seriously dubious about Uhura's taste in men.  He is an arrogant, selfish, mercurial man who is unfortunately talented enough to get away with it.  He does have some redeeming qualities in that he is a hard worker however, I feel that he isn't so much working hard for the good of others, but for the achievement of working out a puzzle, that's what motivates him.  I think he's a good character but I disliked him because he was just, so irritating.  I both liked and disliked his growth in the end that he would end up accepting that Starfleet wasn't as he perceived it to be after all.

Kirk, Spock, and McCoy were pretty standard characterisations.  Kirk was quite passive for much of the novel (much to his chagrin), Spock was ever pragmatic, and McCoy was the emotional 'heart'.  They basically worked in  their standard dynamic where Kirk has to make a decision (this time, regarding Maslin and his health / sacrifice of one for many or few for the many) and Spock and McCoy come in on opposing sides of the argument.

Kirk of course does get his action, and proves that what he expects of Maslin is something he himself would do - and more.  Their final experience focuses on Kirk, so I imagine he is mollified!

There are two sets of antagonists in The Tears of the Singers, firstly the human hunters who are pretty much the kind of people you'd imagine who would club baby seals to death for money and who get dealt with satisfactorily.  Secondly there are the the Klingons, who are pretty well behaved for much of the novel - until Kor's second in command decides to incite mutiny in the two Klingon ships.  Kor's problem is mainly that he has grown to disagree with the Klingon Empire's policies, and... he likes Kirk and grows to like the the humans he meets as representatives of the Federation.  His young wife is also forward thinking and significantly more empathic than the average Klingon.  I mean, sure, they have no problem with executing people, but certainly they are cuddly Klingons.  Ultimately, I liked Kor, he is reasonable and pragmatic and someone I'd definitely have a drink with!

Kind of like how small groups of Romulans can get along with the Enterprise crew too... and their crews mutiny...

Finally...

Although Snodgrass sort to expand the character of Uhura, she ends up falling short and limiting her (Uhura) by her own narrow horizons and by using plot elements that had been used before and better.  Uhura ends up still caught in this web of generic female characterisation, which is disappointing coming from a female author who has deliberately placed her as the supposed centre of her story.  Uhura ends up defined by a male character which is galling, considering in the 60s she was defined by her own parametres, not that of a man and here we see in the 80s a step backwards where her 'leading' role is as a support to a weak but talented man who arguably is actually the main character.

On a particularly immature and disappointing note is Uhura's consideration of whether she has to become a lesbian to be a captain.  Oh Snodgrass, did you feel a little bit naughty using the term lesbian? :/

Generally my feelings for this book can be summed up with 'but someone else did it better', and that someone else happens to be Diane Duane.  Uhura's sections of The Wounded Sky for example, do more for the characterisation of Uhura than the whole of The Tears of the Singers.

3/5 - disappointing but worth a read (probably).

Star Trek - Corona

Kirk was eternally fascinated by the procedures for making the Enterprise ship-shape for a long voyage.  He was familiar with every action as a man watching his wife dress in the morning, and yet... it had that same sort of fascination, of responsibility mixed with a perverse and impossible kind of ownership.  No individual could own a star ship, any more than a man could actually own his wife.  Still, the Enterprise was his.  He wondered what the day would be like when he had to give her up, and whether, if any of his Starfleet colleagues assumed her command, they could possibly remain friends.

Corona by Greg Bear (#15 Pocket, #24 Titan) (1984) is a really interesting instalment in the Pocket novel series for a couple of reasons.  Firstly, we're seeing the theme of entropy again, and this is really exciting for me because I'm finally seeing what I expected to see in the novels that is patterns and trends in themes and content of the novels.  Secondly, for the first time I'm seeing direct references to Gene Roddenberry's 1979 TMP novel and in Greg Bear's case, he has borrowed (to a certain extent) the writing style, characterisation of Kirk, and taking relationship cues from it too.  I was most surprised at the relationship inferences because I didn't expect them from a male author.  Finally, it's interesting because its time line is incredibly kooky which makes it a little confusing as to when exactly the novel takes place - I'm going to run with any time.  I can only imagine that the majority of the story was cooking for a long time (pre-films) and so there's some artistic license in there too.

Greg Bear himself is still an active author and although Corona was his first and only Star Trek novel, he is still active in the community.  Bear writes a wide selection of fiction, including tie-in novels for the Halo universe.

Find more about the author at his site www.gregbear.com and on his page on imdb.

Corona itself is, for me at least, a 'so-so' novel.  Whilst I was reading it I would visualise a big 3/5 stamped across the cover.

Read a brief summary of Corona here (memory beta).

There are lots of problems with it for example the time line is pretty much as kooky as you can get.  The novel listing I often refer to lists Corona as taking place in 2270, which is just after the original series.  Keep in mind that TMP occurs in 2273, got it?  Ok, there's this funny 'dating' (not that kind) paragraph:

Spock sat stolidly on his immaculate stone meditation plank, eyes closed, deep in mathematical exercises he had taken up lately, conditional to his entry into the third stage of Vulcan life at age seventy-nine.

Hold up!  Seventy-nine?!  Spock was born in 2230 and if this is 2270...  That makes him forty, surely?  Much of the narrative implies that it is within the scope of the five year mission, but why age Spock this way?  Is Kirk supposed to be older too?  And where does this leave poor Amanda and her age, and Sarek for that matter?  Anyway, I think it's safe to assume that it is 2270 and not later because the rest of the crew are present and in their same positions - even Yeoman Rand is there!

Bear has an odd take on Vulcans at times too, strange little rituals and ticks.  The story very hinges on the Vulcan 'otherness', but in making them a little too 'other' or 'strange' they kind of feel a little odd to me.  I can't pin it down well, but it's like seeing through a glass darkly.  I can accept a certain amount of artistic licence but sometimes there's some strange 'insight' from these authors, possibly because it is before much of the 'official' details of the Vulcan species had been finalised.  It was interesting however to have Vulcan children play a role as we don't often see Vulcan children portrayed (there's little reason to).  I guess they are essentially little adults, ignoring of course the brats who bully Spock in the AU (who frankly just act like bully children, not something 'other' as I imagine Vulcan children to be).  The resolution of Corona hinges on the fact that the child Vulcans haven't gone through a ritual to make them adults, and although this does happen canonically I don't think it is supposed to be an event which comes from without, but instead it's the completion of a trial which marks them as adults.  This kind of ties into a loose theme of 'coming of age' but it doesn't really dwell on this too much and appear somewhat accidental (even if this links into 'Mason's' story line.

Anyway, none of that is really that interesting, I just needed to get some of those thoughts out the way.

The first thing that I really noticed while reading Corona was that it is the first novel that has really drawn from Roddenberry's TMP novelisation.  The characterisation of Kirk, his somewhat uncomfortable phrasing and too-long idling over sexual thoughts - they are all there in Corona.  References to the telepathic connection between Kirk and Spock are in there too - and certainly their closeness.  Furthermore, I think that this is the first instance of the brain implant being referenced, which also makes its first appearance in the TMP novel.  I am surprised that it has taken this long for these features to make their appearance in the novel series thus far, or at least a real indication that writers have read the first book in the Pocket Book series (the TMP novelisation).  Ok, perhaps I'm deliberately ignoring Marshak and Culbreath because of their blatant agenda and kinks, their two additions to the series (Triangle and Chains of Prometheus).  I really like that it's a man picking up on these aspect too, quietly adding in the telepathic link between Kirk and Spock that kind of rumbles in the back ground of their relationship.

Of course, it does fit in with the story with Kirk should have the implant as mentioned in the TMP novelisation.  Much of the novel is given over to 'the monitors', a computer system installed at the beginning of the story, with the capacity and authority to override commands / requests of personnel on board the Enterprise.  They are meant to prevent for example, captains from making bad decisions, if the monitors disagree with the captain's decisions then they will override the captain and take action without anyone else's say-so.  There are also monitors for sick bay too, much to McCoy's chagrin.

Does anyone else find this uncomfortable?  I certainly do!

Kirk doesn't care for it much either, but with little choice given to him he has to play by the rules.  He ends up with an additional monitor as well, in the form of a young woman reporter.  I was actually really happy to see this story line used, because this is the first instance of the 'reporter / monitor' character and really the first time we see this kind of... conflict within Starfleet where they are trying to tighten control of their fleet and personnel.  Bureaucracy of course is seen in the original series, but certainly in TMP we know there are problems on earth and Starfleet is under pressure from 'New Human' groups.  A later novel that I have reviewed with a similar theme of Kirk having a monitor is The Starship Trap.  Ultimately, the female monitor in both novels ends up being a boon to Kirk, but interestingly there is no romance involving Kirk in either of them.  The 'monitor' storyline is tied up by them being judged not fit for purpose, with the moral that commanders (and medical officers etc.) should be able to act as they see fit in the circumstances, without any computer intervention.

Interestingly, the monitors do take control away from Kirk in the end, because he chooses to hold fire.  He felt conflicted about firing on the station and thus possibly killing Spock and Mason in the process.  The monitors fired on the station because Kirk didn't want to act, because he was 'too concerned', and that possibly he didn't act because he knew the monitors would take the weight off his shoulders and make the decision for him.  In a way this is a challenge, would the imposition of these monitors stop people growing?  Stop them from being the best humanity has to offer?  Additionally, Kirk's humanity and respect for life makes him who he is, his judgement not to fire, his empathy being over-ridden by an algorithm... would a captain ever be truly followed when the crew knows their judgement is going to be constantly judged and changed by an algorithm on a computer?

Just a thought.

Finally, I was really interested to see the theme of entropy appearing again.  It certainly seems to be the strongest / most common theme so far, especially since the last use of it was in The Wounded Sky, the last book but one, the first was The Entropy Effect.  All three stories have dealt with the theme a different way however.  The Entropy Effect was caused by the actions of a man and has to do with time travel, The Wounded Sky again is to do with the actions of scientists but concludes with the meeting of a new, God-like, life form.  Corona handles it differently again, a non-corporeal life form wishes to accelerate entropy in order for it to cause the end of  our universe and the rebirth of the environment needed for it and its species to exist (essentially the big bang).  Funnily enough, it also has to use technology to achieve its goals, which it achieves through using the Vulcans as its arms and legs and the frozen 'sleepers' as memory storage units.

The 'action' of the story is a little bit messy and at times the author seems to forget which crew members are present (poor Chapel!) and whether they are capable of critical thinking at all.  The story itself feels like it was written some time before publication, perhaps even before TMP but was revised afterwards to add in extra bits of lore.  Unfortunately it doesn't seem to have been edited enough to make the old and the new mesh and the story can be somewhat bitty as a result and unfortunately at times, pretty contrived.  However, on a whole its passable, and it is obvious by Bear's success that he improved greatly in subsequent books to working on other popular sci-fi franchises and series of his own design.

For the modern reader, the story feels quite tired.  I think in particular using the trope of 'possessed children' but then not really building on that as something scary was a bit of a let down.  Perhaps that was somewhat endemic in the whole book, things were kind of introduced but the ideas weren't really developed, almost like the author didn't know quite where he wanted the ideas to go.  The idea of the monitors was built on, but when it came down to the execution of their orders over Kirk's it was a little... anticlimactic.  Mason's xenophobia never really peaks, and her character development just doesn't seem that compelling.  That being said, on the subject of characterisation, I did enjoy the Roddenberryish portrayal of Kirk's character, Spock's wry moments and McCoy's humourous, cantankerous nature.  I think Bear was a little weak on the development of the female characters though - Chapel's description as 'spinsterish' was particularly harsh!

3/5 - take a cold shower Kirk!

Star Trek - The Trellisane Confrontation

Kirk had been staring into space, not lost in thought, but helpless and hopeless, stunned by the loss of his ship.  He had never felt quite so abandoned, so lost, his very foundation removed.  McCoy leaned toward him and said softly, "Jim.  Captain Kirk!"

I have to say I was elated on reading The Trellisane Confrontation by David Dvorkin (1984) (#14 Pocket, #31 Titan), after all I was bracing myself for a literary blooper after having three excellent books on the trot.  After the hit and miss approach to the first ten books in the series, I have to admit I was getting a little downhearted at the prospect of having to suffer more of the same in books #11 to #20.  Honestly, it's like they turned a corner at Web of the Romulans, hopefully they don't look back?

That isn't to say The Trellisane Confrontation doesn't have problems, it does... a surprising amount in fact considering how short it is but it does have more of a feeling of an episode than the previous three books, which felt like they could never really be episodes (I acknowledge The Wounded Sky was adapted to a certain extent for an episode in TNG).

Okok, note on the cover.  Accurate uniform on Spock, this novel takes place in 2269, so during the original five year mission.  I actually like this cover a lot, it's colourful, it's fun... it's... who is that woman in the middle?  I was waiting for a damsel to appear but uhm... she doesn't?  I had a thought that it was supposed to be Chapel, but then why not put her in uniform, and I don't really think she fits the description of the warrior women of Nactern either, other than those mentioned and other than Uhura (who it most definitely isn't) there aren't any other female characters?

Edit:  Ok, people seem to think it's Christine Chapel...  I'll believe them, I suppose Spock looks facially squiffy too...

The Trellisane Confrontation follows a quite a simple plot.  The Enterprise is transporting dangerous criminals who are affiliated to a political faction who wish the Federation to go to war with the Romulans.  Whilst transporting them, Kirk decides to go to the aid of a peaceful, neutral, planet being attacked by it's aggressive sister planet in a system in a precarious position between the three powers (Federation, Klingon Empire, Romulan Star Empire).  Spock and McCoy express their reservations about going to aid this planet with dangerous prisoners on board, but Kirk is adamant and proceeds without confirmation from Starfleet.

Naturally, everything goes wrong.  The prisoners on the Enterprise escape and gain control of the ship in order to try to start a war with the Romulans while Kirk, Spock and McCoy are on Trellisane.  The Trellisane people are not the peaceful progressive people they appear to be, the attacking Sealons and Klingons step up their invasion plans, and Spock and Kirk are captured by the Klingon and Sealon forces, leaving McCoy to organise a the Trellisane people and uncover their dark secrets.

That's the set up for The Trellisane Confrontation, and although a little simplistic at times the first half is a pretty strong and enjoyable read.  The pacing is good, it doesn't sweat the small stuff and expects the reader to fill in some gaps.  However, in the second half of the novel Dvorkin appears to lose impetus and aside from a very interesting section with Christine Chapel melding with an alien it doesn't have many other high points, in fact I became quite irritable about some inconsistencies I couldn't un-see!  The novel resolves itself a little too quickly not allowing Dvorkin to really get the meat (ha) of his story.  We get a need to know exposition via McCoy of the Trellisane culture, a rather pathetic bunch who are essentially cowards and cannibals.  The Sealons, the species being manipulated by the Klingons turn out to be a bit on the rough side but rather more likeable than the Trellisane people, despite never hearing a word directly out of their mouths.  The political situation gets resolved in a couple of pages... and Klingons and Romulans beam straight onto the bridge for discussions?

My main complaint however is what I can only suggest are strange, loose, narrative threads that by the end of The Trellisane Confrontation are not resolved.  The odd moralising at the end which attempts to give an illusion of tying those threads but really just leaves them broken.  This is really shame because it really does spoil the book, in my estimation, after a well paced and pleasant first half.

Here's an example; Spock notices behaviour he doesn't like in Kirk, and this rattles him and his confidence in Kirk.  Personally I didn't see a problem or out of the ordinary behaviour, but I ran with it.  I spent from that time onwards waiting for some sort of revelation that something was wrong with Kirk, like, there's something in the air on Trellisane, or there was something in that delicious delicious meat her ate... but it's nothing.  It turns out that Spock hero-worships Kirk and just hadn't seen this aspect of him before...  We are in the same year as The City on the Edge of Forever guys...  you know each other quite well at this point!

Spock followed him, and as Kirk leaned over to offer him a hand to help, Spock was amazed to see that his captain's face wore a broad grin.  It was something beyond simple levity or the release of long suppressed tension, Spock thought; it seemed more the joy of a young boy on a long-awaited long-delayed holiday.

(...)

Now, suddenly, the control seemed to have disappeared.  In this earnest, deadly business, James Kirk was behaving with boyish glee rather than the calm determination Spock night have expected.  Kirk was dropping to the level of the average human, and Spock, who would have been greatly insulted had anyone suggested to him that he was capable of hero worship, was deeply disturbed. 

 This actually connects with analysis of the criminal who takes control of the Enterprise.  In several sections the criminal (Hander) is likened to Kirk and in a final exchange with Spock and McCoy, they underscore their similarities.  Now, I might be a Kirk devotee, but I think this is a bit of a stretch and Spock and McCoy's final condemnation? criticism? of Kirk's character and actions during the events of the novel was quite inaccurate and very unfair.  Kirk was right to be angry about what they were saying!

The slave/cannibal aspect of the Trellisanians was interesting, especially when reflected by McCoy.  I particularly liked the 'not all as things appear theme' which was prevalent, and probably does the best job at holding the story together.

The subplot (?) on the Enterprise where Hander Morl and his five alien allies take control of the bridge was actually pretty enjoyable, and I especially relished my least favourite character Sulu being the one to cock up utterly and cause the whole situation.  Chekov's scenes were excellent, and his trying to emulate Kirk was wonderfully written and very funny.  Uhura was very much in the background but what did surprise me was as mentioned before, Chapel's section.  I think that was very well done although ultimately she doesn't reveal her experiences.

Ultimately, The Trellisane Confrontation is an enjoyable book and well worth a read.  It doesn't reach the heights of The Wounded Sky or the tension of Mutiny on the Enterprise, this book is smaller in scope and less detailed than the previous couple of novels.  Characters are a little out of character at times, although Dvorkin seems to be better at characterising the likes of Sulu and Chekov than Spock and Kirk.  Action is a little disjointed and at times frustratingly sparse on details, but not necessarily bad.  I don't think The Trellisane Confrontation adds anything to the existing characters, Dvorkin does create an interesting culture in the Trellisane species.

3/5 - don't order the steak.