Star Trek - The Price of the Phoenix

Jim Kirk scrubbed at his eyes and tried to see, tried to breathe against the sobbing that racked him in uncontrollable spasms, tried somehow to ease the intolerable mass of pain that was his whole body.

It was only a little worse where the big arm crushed him against the massive chest, carrying him now like a child, the single arm looped around his chest and under his thighs, balancing him on one hip, while the other arm reached for something.

Still trying to avoid reading Memory Prime, I looked at my to read shelf and considered my options, all 100+ of them.

Then it caught my eye; I didn't think I had that one, says I, having obviously missed it when looking for the four Sondra Marshak and Myrna Culbreath novels.  Well, since I'd been feeling a little down I thought, well, they're usually good for a laugh.

I was right!

The Price Of The Phoenix (1977) is Sondra Marshak and Myrna Culbreath's first published Star Trek novel and... it's quite the experience.  Yes yes, it's not actually in the Pocket Series (it was published under Bantam) but the other two books in the series are and I've already read those!  So this is where it all began...eh?

Actually it didn't all begin here.

The first version of The Price of the Phoenix (and The Fate of the Phoenix) was Never Mourn Black Omne which was privately published and printed prior to reaching an agreement with Paramount and Bantam Books, and is extremely limited edition; it is unknown how widely this book was circulated.  I haven't read it myself (I think it would probably have to be a lucky ebay find!) but from an excerpt found on fanlore.org it seems fairly similar.

The thing is with Marshak and Culbreath is that the more I read their novels, the more I know them as people.  They're writing 'Star Trek' novels, sure, but they end up revealing more about themselves than actually reflecting the characters or the Star Trek universe.  I suppose that actually, quite a few of the earlier Star Trek books have this quality, it gives them a soul which is sorely lacking in some of the more recent releases.  Saying that however, I could probably have done with a bit less 'soul' in The Price of the Phoenix.  As I've mentioned before, Marshak and Culbreath were not stupid, in fact by all accounts they seem to be incredibly bright.  Culbreath founded her own private academy before selling it and moving down to live with Marshak and her husband.  Marshak earned a Masters degree in history with honours, she was planning a PhD and wanted to write 'culture changing non-fiction' and then... she discovered Star Trek and gave it all up to devote herself to the show and writing fanfiction.  Marshak (from the age of 13) was an avowed Objectivist (Ayn Rand) and believed that Star Trek advanced Objectivist ideals.

The idea of Star Trek advancing Objectivism is quite strange, since objectivism at it's core is right-wing / capitalist; which in many ways Star Trek is not (although I'd argue that even as a post scarcity society, it's not actually socialist at all.. anyway).  I tried to do a little bit of research on objectivism in order to try to apply it to Price but the work I was willing to do just acting on a hunch wasn't really enough to get anywhere particularly entertaining.  Superficially however, without going into the nitty gritty of Rand's philosophy there are some ideas which can be identified as objectivist in the broadest sense.

Anyway, attempting to cut the rambling about pseudo academia short, the most obvious objectivist idea in Price is

the belief that certain things, especially moral truths, exist independently of human knowledge or perception of them. 

and that

"...(Objectivism), in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute." - Ayn Rand, Appendix to Atlas Shrugged

The concept of the heroic being, is central to the narrative of Price, and actually all their novels I've read so far.  The heroic being is invariably Kirk who is basically a cinnamon roll too pure for this world characterised as being Adonis but with the tactical ability of Alexander.  The moral truths are also exemplified by Kirk, who is unaware of his virtue or power although every person who meets him recognises these truths in him.  Kirk is unique because his own happiness -being the captain of the Enterprise- is his moral purpose but also serves a greater purpose which exists dependently of his own will - independent of his knowledge or perception.

Kirk's purity of purpose is what drives... perhaps it's better to say 'causes' the plot.  Omne is attracted to him as a light to his darkness, as a contrasting figure who reminds him of who he was many, many years ago.  The events that take place are not incidental, it's all planned by Omne in order to take possession of Kirk body and mind; this is central, all other plots and machinations are red herrings.

Like The Entropy Effect which would be noted for the fact it kills Kirk outright in a slashy death scene, Price (which of course is the earlier work) also starts with Kirk's death and Spock's emotional response.  We're told it truly is Kirk who has died, no doubt in McCoy's mind.  Spock saw Kirk die...   of course he didn't.  A clone of Kirk was substituted for the 'real' one as he was transported away by Omne.  We're introduced to another clone Kirk who takes the name 'James' while the original uses 'Jim'.  The Romulan commander gets rather fond of 'James', though we're told that she probably got together with 'Jim' when she was being transported on the Enterprise previously.  Spock turns into a testosterone filled (or whatever the Vulcan equivalent is) super Vulcan, not quite VULCAN COMMAND MODE, but close.  All the incidents which lead up to the 'main event(s)' aren't really important, the're just a clumsy method for getting to Marshak and Culbreath's kinks (which I'll get to in a bit).  There's a chase through an under ground labyrinth, lots of sexual imagery, med bay in a bottle (spraycan), nudity, manly 'vulcanoid' fighting... and for once both the clone and the original Kirk survive!  The Romulan commander gets 'James' and Spock gets 'Jim', and everyone lives happily ever after... but they know one day Omne will return... (oh no...)

A more sensible summary of The Price Of The Phoenix on Memory Beta.

I'm not going to waste time summarising this novel seriously, there's no point since it can be found elsewhere.  I am going waste time looking at the appalling descriptions, hyper sexual imagery, and general kinkiness.  I'm also going to repeatedly wonder how this got published.

So, I'm going to start with picking out a wonderful (?) example of the redundant descriptions which litter this hot mess, because everyone needs to suffer this with me.  At least I suppose they improved over time and sentences like -

"So," he said with the deceptive mildness which let the deception show through, "that makes it interesting."

- become less commonplace, but Price is full of them.  When I read a section to my partner, he had to stop me every so often to reread sentences.  Sure, you can work out what they are trying to say, but the descriptions are kinda what you'd expect from a fifteen year old dabbling in fanfiction for the first time; more often than not a horny fifteen year old at that.  Language is very clumsy and at times repetitive -

Kirk felt an odd jolt on some level he couldn't even name. Or-wouldn't.  Perhaps somewhere on the level of what he was refusing to name, even to himself.  Let it be blunt, brute fact.

 But this -

Clumsy, repetitive, badly edited.

Not to mention this particular section follows Omne telling Kirk he didn't want him in the line of fire.  Oh dear.  The big scary vulcanoid wanted to protect the weak pretty earth man, so he carried him off to his secret lair, ministered to his wounds forcefully and erotically.  You know, this is all very familiar; I seem to recall similar events occurring in two other novels by this deplorable duo, and I have little doubt that the next Phoenix book has rather the same kink in it.  I wouldn't be surprised if Omne erotically beats up Kirk again, Jim or James! Spock will go super angry Vulcan, then they kiss and make up, right?

Speaking of erotic.

I really could dedicate this review(?) to erotic imagery in Price but I'd be even more delayed in  publishing this than I already am.  There are two particular scenes / images that stand out to me.  One has already been mentioned, and that's the scene where Omne smashes Jim (the original) into a bloody, broken pulp while James (the copy) and the Romulan commander watch.  I don't even have to go into that James starts to feel the pain of Jim, and then this transmits to Spock.  The one-sided pounding fight between Jim and Omne is pretty much a H/C / sadistic exercise in homo-erotic voyeurism.  I mean, there is no way for Kirk to prevail, Omne is bigger, stronger, more intelligent, described as 'alpha male', king of the jungle following jungle laws (that extended metaphor is the cringiest cringe).

Serious cringe.

Oh gosh, I haven't even mentioned the strange virginity / loss of virginity / rape sections have I?  The clone Kirk is dressed in a white tunic (obviously because he's pure), but feels all the pain of the original (messiah comparison?).  In one section he slides down a pole (the main transportation through the underground labyrinth), but he has no trousers on so his thighs an nethers are scalded to bloody rawness by the friction from the pole.  So, after that he's basically walking around in a white tunic, bleeding between the legs... mmph.  How did that get past the editor too?  The original Kirk also feels these injuries... I'm surprised they didn't go further and describe him sharing that particular violation, or would that make it too obvious?

Anyway.

Let's just skip to the end.  The Price of the Phoenix is an awful book in any context and really just reinforces what I already knew about these two authors.  I don't understand how they were able to return again and again to rehash this same story with the same kinks in again and again.  The very worst of it is this obsession with emasculating Kirk repeatedly.  Yes, Kirk does have a soft side which is at times so gentle, but these two seem almost unable to actually write MxM stuff without making one of the characters a surrogate female.  You see this a lot in fiction involving gay men which is written for women.  One of the characters is always the female stand in, and in this case it's Kirk.

You know, I can't even say they 'know' the series well, because as far as characterisation goes, I don't believe they do.  It feels like they've developed Kirk, Spock and the others into other characters and not the characters they are meant to be.  I could say they they might as well be writing a series with all original characters but then it wouldn't stand out as having a prevailing sense of all round wrongness.

The Price of the Phoenix only stands out and is worth talking about because of how wrong it all is there is literally no merit in it.  By all means read it out of curiosity, read it because its kinda historical and because it costs a couple of pence to buy... but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone except those with an interest in early published slash / mxm stuff.

1/5 - bloody thighs, guys.

Star Trek - How Much For Just The Planet

Arizhel picked up the Cat robber and shoved him into the closet.  She pressed the lock button, since Charlotte had the key, then shut the door, listening for the click.  She heard the cat stir within.  That was disappointing; she must be out of practice.
She went back towards the door.  Stitches popped like bursts of gunfire.  Instinctively she grabbed at the scraps of black as they fell away.  It seemed to make things worse.
But she did not need the Cat costume any longer.  She could simply change back into her dress...
Which was  locked in the closet, behind the Cat.

How Much For Just The Planet (#36 Pocket, # Titan) by John M Ford is another slightly experimental story in keeping with Ford's rule not to write the same kind of story twice.   I think HMFJTP is a kind of marmite story, but very much in the style of TOS in that it could have very much been an episode of from the TV series.  Incredibly campy both in writing style and the events in the story itself, it is also very self aware.  Ridiculous things happen in HMFJTP, the whole latter half of the book is orchestrated slap stick comedy ending in a pie fight between all the characters.  The end is also moralising, and highlights one of the problems with the Organian treaty - what if the people of the disputed planet want nothing to do with either the Federation nor the Klingon Empire?

I was in two minds while reading HMFJTP, it was pure TOS through and through, brilliant characterisation, a refreshing approach to story telling, hell, I enjoyed it.  On the other hand the prolonged slapstick comedy sketch didn't quite work for me and I couldn't help cringing at this comedy of errors.

Stylistically HMFJTP is really interesting.  When the Federation and Klingon diplomatic delegations beam down to Direidi to attempt to negotiate who would be developing the planet and it's dilithium resources the reader is made immediately aware that what the crew are experiencing is all staged and an act.  The reader has been told of 'Plan C', we know it's all scripted and throughout the surreal experiences we often get given small 'behind the scenes'... well... scenes.   The Direidians break into musical-esque song at the merest provocation, much to the bemusement of the Federation and Klingon crews, who are trying to be accepting of this strange people (which of course helps to keep the ruse going).  The songs are written in italicised stanzas, predominantly in rhyming couplets, and are often quite lengthy!  The songs work as a kind of shorthand for setting the scene, much as they would in a piece of musical theatre (they're also mostly awful!).  We expect for the hi-jinx to begin when the 'worlds collide' as it were, however the strange, theatrical occurrences happen from the beginning of the narrative and in the formatting of the text itself.

Something that stands out immediately is that every chapter has a title, for example:

- In Space, No One Can Fry an Egg

- The Dilithium Crystal As Big As The Ritz

- All's Fair In Love and Dilithium

and there are also 'interlude' chapters such as:

- Educational Short Subject: Useful Facts about Dilithium

- Historical Interlude: The Only War We've Got

which are written with a theme and are written stylistically differently.  The 'Educational Short Subject' is written as if it's a sponsored children's infomercial, the 'Historical Interlude' is a comically written explanation of the terms of the Organian Treaty and the Federation and the Empire's respective opinions on it (that interlude tickled me!).

It's also interesting to note that the strange goings on or perhaps the tone of the novel starts immediately in the narrative too.  From the beginning the whole story has a certain humour to it.  Whether it's the replicator's inability to produce orange juice which isn't blue, Kirk deciding he was brave enough to try the electric blue concoction, or that the events of the story may have been put into motion by a sloppy Vulcan who spilt a minty milk shake over integral parts of her ship's computer, causing it to become quite insane.  These events continue as Kirk & Co. are brought into the story, the diplomat for the mission is an old flame (whom he'd forgotten) and the sloppy Vulcan is known to Spock (he exhibits a slight tick when he suspects she's involved); this is even before the diplomatic party arrives at the planet.

I mean... on one hand we have the expected ridiculous and scripted events on Direidi which really are laugh out loud funny (the cherry on the cake was the utterly ridiculous 'pie fight', but the multiple cases of misdirection and tongue in cheek film / theatre references) and on the other we have the 'universe' acting in much the same way which makes it both less and more absurd.  This is quite in keeping I feel with episodes of TOS which can vary between serious intellectualism to broad comedy, though HMFJTP is far beyond anything featured in the show.

I really did like that Ford continued with his expansion of Klingon society.  I really did like the internal thoughts of the Klingon characters who were by Klingon standards, quite pleasant.  'Proke' was quite the match to Uhura and was definitely a development from Ford's Klingons.  Proke and Uhura both worked out what was going on on Direidi, and so their adventure was the most strange (and the shortest) as they were preempting the directed events and essentially identifying the tropes and their origin films / series as they came across them.

I think the most fun comes from the variety of different adventures the different groups of the diplomatic party had.  One section was shamelessly drawing from 'She' (which made me chuckle), another with the party running over a golf course amid shell fire I know I've seen but I can't recall the film.  Eventually the sets start to fall apart but by that time everyone is ready for a stress reducing pie fight!

Of course, unless you're a director, you're not going to escape a situation like this without egg on your face, and in this case the people of Direidi who don't want any part of politics manage to manipulate the situation in such a way that their preferred proposal for Dilithium mining on their planet has to be accepted by the diplomats of both the Federation and the Empire.

Like I said How Much For Just The Planet is a reader's marmite, I can't guarantee you'll like it, but I can honestly say that it is a well written Star Trek novel with a premise that could only be pulled off in practise by someone with Ford's ability. 

If you know your 1940s, 50s, and 60s cinema and contemporary theatre, you'll have a good time picking out the references!

4/5 - Here's looking at you, kid.

Star Trek - Demons

Spock looked away as her chin trembled.  "It was you father who killed both Starnn and Silek."  She covered her face with her hands.
"My father,"  Spock corrected her gently, "killed no one.  Whatever, whoever controls Sarek now is responsible for their deaths."  He gently pulled her hands from her face, and she tried to smile at him.

I skipped ahead to Demons by J M Dillard (#30 Pocket, #43 Titan) (1986) because at least she is a known quantity to me, and the three left over in this ten made me wince a little bit when I read the blurbs.  To be fair so did Demons, but at least I have some idea of what Dillard is going to throw at me now...

... and to be fair it was very 'Dillard'.

Like Mindshadow there was a lot going on, but it wasn't quite as crowded with references and loose end story threads, and I'm happy to say there was no wrist slitting, though Demons did contain:

• Wrist spraining
• Spock braining
• Kirk's rib breaking
• McCoy poisoning and,
• Cast brainwashing

Not to mention:

• Sarek shaming
• Vulcan murdering and,
• OC powerupping

Ok, you get the picture.  It's still busy and if you've read Mindshadow you'll get the idea that Dillard really likes a few particular story elements:

• Keeping Kirk ignorant, because who tells captains anything these days
• Vulcans doing un-Vulcan things
• Vulcan (the planet)
• Injuring the main cast, no pain no gain
• Sarek and Amanda
• Starfleet / Federation being super sneaky (also in Bloodthirst)
• "Super amazing" female OC everyone loves, also McCoy ends up as her romance option and is a very jealous lover
• Kirk is left out of much the action
• OC Soap Opera
• ISS

Sorry about that but Demons is... well.  It's a bit special.

Demons is J M Dillard's second published Star Trek TOS novel, the first being Mindshadow (1985) and the next being Bloodthirst (1987).  She would go on to write two more Star Trek TOS novels and six Star Trek movie novel adaptations.

I said in my Bloodthirst review that I would be interested in seeing Dillard's progression, and I can honestly say that she does improve but she remains pretty mediocre.  Mindshadow was amateurish fantasy fulfillment that needed more editing than it got, Demons improves marginally as she makes her narrative a little tighter but there are still too many threads and not enough exposition.

So, what is Demons (1986) about anyway?

Well, imagine The Exorcist (1973) in space, but instead of demonic possession it's sentient subatomic particles binding to the brain's neurotransmitters.  These subatomic particles propagate via hypnosis and feed on the fear and pain of the people they commit cruel and sadistic acts upon.  These 'demons' have destroyed an ancient civilisation before, what will they do to the Federation?!

Oh dang, I've read this before.  Wait, wait, I've got it.  Legends End 1 (1984).  Oops.

Well, it could be a coincidence, Legends End has sadistic dark elves who feed off fear and act of sadism via brain implant type things.  I've been searching through some contemporary reviews and I haven't seen any comparisons at the time but that doesn't mean there aren't any there - my access to such things is far from comprehensive.  Also, reviews of Demons seem very positive - even today, I'm sorry ladies and gentlemen, I simply don't see the merits of this book!

Some reviewers have even said that it's a masterpiece of Trek fiction.  Don't-Make-Me-laugh.

One of the big red flags for me was the inclusion of the character Anitra, who it turns out was a Starfleet/Federation intelligence agent (human) who has a super high psi rating (over 500!).  She is beautiful, she has amazing hair, she is super intelligent, can read minds, does something that could get her court martialled, doesn't get court martialled, everyone seems to love her.  A reviewer in IDIC 15 comments that she's the same character type as Evan Wilson (Uhura's Song), which pretty much makes perfect sense as to why I particularly disliked her - hi ho Mary Sue!

The reason given for Anitra's inclusion as a character in the first place is that because of her super high psi rating she can sense the evil in things.  Wait, I thought we had a scientific explanation for all this, Vulcans seem to have psi ratings at about this level, and there are other telepathic species in the Federation.  Humanity on the other hand are pretty much universally psi-null aside from one or two exceptions... even then I don't think they're a touch on Vulcan telepathy.  What's made slightly worse is that she's given the same kind of telepathy as Vulcans have - touch telepathy.

So frankly, I don't know where Dillard is coming from.  In Bloodthirst she did this funny mixing of science and the supernatural - well I say mixing, but it was pretty much oil and water - but it was clumsy and just didn't seem to work well, Demons is the same.  We have a scientific explanation, we have scientists working on the problem, why oh why are we still using terms like 'evil' and 'demons' when this is all explainable?  Now if, if Anitra was a mystic of some sort and Dillard had left in some sort of inexplicable mysticism as part of the story then Demons would have worked better - and it wouldn't have been outside of Star Trek's track record at all.

Characterisation of the main cast was okay?  It wasn't anything to write home about, and the fact Kirk is never told what's going on really chafes.  I mean why would Starfleet keep it secret from him?  Why would they only tell Spock?  Kirk would have been able to take the right course of action from the beginning if he'd only been told, he'd have been able to protect his crew.  Of course, that would mean Dillard would have had to have thought a little bit harder about how to progress the story.

Having this strange love triangle between Spock, McCoy and Anitra was...  awkward.  Although I had to laugh since McCoy got the girl in Mindshadow as well, and was a jealous lover then too!  Instead of Kirk being his rival, it was Spock this time!  Oh dear, McCoy is such a green eyed monster!

Dillard's OCs were present, but this time Security Chief Tomson had a useful role and was a little more of a rounded character.  I did like that Kirk doesn't actually like her though!  I have to wonder what happened to Nguyen though... last we heard of her she was told to hide in her quarters about halfway through the book, and she doesn't resurface...

One section I particularly liked however was when Kirk 'is cured' of the demon affliction and basically has to save his hostile crew on a scuttled Enterprise, whilst Spock, McCoy and Anitra have their own little adventure on Vulcan (they left him!).  I thought this was actually the strongest part of the book (and that's not just because Kirk was in it...), it was pretty tense and trying to work out who was safe or not was stressful!  Certainly there were strong TV horror elements although I'm not 100% sure they work with Star Trek, it didn't quite sit right with me.  Of course, having the Enterprise as basically a hot lab meant that Kirk actually figured out the solution via trial and error quicker than the 'scientists' on Vulcan.

Once Demons reaches its crescendo the narrative hurtles at breakneck speed to the end - in only twelve pages the book wraps up, with a lot of questions.  One thing that really bothers me is that Dillard does not return things to the status quo, there are a lot of repercussions from this story which in her haste to finish, have been swept under the carpet.  There's been murder on Vulcan, murder on the Enterprise, torture.  What about the ships which left Vulcan already infected (Dillard stated that some must have got to Earth already), how about the ship which fired on the Enterprise?  If a starship captain can work out the solution, why oh why did we need the Mary-Sue character in the first place?

Demons is really quite trashy and is quite reminiscent of popular 'horror' fiction of the time.  Not my cup of tea (and it's not because of the horror aspect) but some people obviously like it.  I'm not a fan of the Mary-Sue character type, I think the narrative could have progressed without Anitra, and I feel that the effects of the events of the novel were too far reaching and dire to be essentially glossed over at the end.  That being said Dillard's writing writing style is is pleasant and easy to read, so despite the content being not so great you still end up enjoying 'the writing' if nothing else.

2/5 - Leonard McCoy, Green Eyed Monster MD

Star Trek - Black Fire

But the doctor's main concern was on the severe condition of the captain; he hadn't yet assessed all of Kirk's injuries and McCoy entered surgery not knowing exactly what he would find.  At least hes alive - barely.

It took all of McCoy's professional detachment to suppress his despair when he full examined his patient and his friend.  There were just so many organs one could transplant, just so much one could patch and mend the human body.  Kirk's wounds pressed that limit.

Black Fire (#8 Pocket, #37 Titan) (1983) by Sonni Cooper starts with a bang, a big one.  I have to be honest, not many authors have the gall to pen an event that nearly kills one of the main characters within the first line of chapter one.  And when I say 'nearly kills' I mean only the fact Kirk is protected by virtue of being Kirk, Captain of the Enterprise, but he was as close to dead and out of the narrative as Cooper could make him.  Kirk is absent then for pretty much half the book and even when he does come back nobody bothers to tell him what is going on and he ends up having to feel his way through the narrative like a blind man without a cane.

Strike one.  Will Black Fire get three strikes? Will it hit a home run?  I don't know, but I do know I've never watched a baseball game in my life!

So, ok, I've jumped ahead a little bit, but as an ardent lover of all things Kirk I just had to get it off my chest.  I suppose I was surprised that the story took the route it did, after all I excitedly read the excellent introduction and the praises lauded onto Sonni Cooper and thought Yes!  This is going to be a gem!  Well, lets say don't expect ruby, expect garnant and you'll be fine.

So, as I said, Black Fire starts with a bang, which incapacitates Kirk for a lengthy time and seriously damages the Enterprise.  Spock (also injured) finds that the evidence points to a deliberate bombing with the intention of robbing Kirk of his life.  On submitting the evidence to the Federation, he finds them unwilling to listen to him or sanction an action into the investigation of the bombing.  Instead they seem to want to brush it all under the carpet, keeping it all hush hush.  Although I guess this is plausible, one of their advanced ships has essentially just been towed to a space dock for extensive repairs, crew members have died, the captain is critically injured... this isn't going to go away.  So... why?

Spock then takes it upon himself to investigate further, enlisting Scotty to aid him in stealing a ship and investigating co-ordinates he has worked out from various clues left by the Enterprise's bomber.  Naturally, this goes horribly wrong and Spock and Scott are captured by a barbaric race of small, suicidal, furry humanoids who want to take over the galaxy.  You'd think that would be the meat of it?  No... That's not the half of it.  Spock and Scott escape, get court martialled and punished.  Spock ends up making friends with a Romulan pirate  who he then escapes with, becomes a pirate himself, joins the Romulan Empire, acts as an intermediary between the Federation and the Empire, helps broker peace between the small furries and the Federation / Empire... 

Kirk in the meantime is busy recovering.  A lot of time passes in this novel, the Enterprise is refitted and absentee crew is replaced.  Kirk assumes command of the Enterprise once more to find... a new first officer, science officer and head of engineering.  Seriously, he knew nothing about that, nobody told him what happened to Spock and Scott, not even his bridge crew.  Seriously, poor Kirk.

Kirk ends up running into Spock again and again, once as the pirate 'Black Fire' and then as sub-commander Spock of the Romulan Empire.  Kirk's heart is just about breaking THE WHOLE TIME.  Insight from Spock?  Not much, there might be a feeling somewhere, but he seems more concerned about his new Romulan friend than Kirk.  Huh.. ok.

So, you'd be forgiven for wondering just HOW short of time travel, will this mess be cleaned up.  I hope you'll forgive me for spoiling but... BECAUSE HE WAS UNDERCOVER.  Well that's all right then!  That explains everything!... not.  What a hot mess!

From what I can understand, the Federation had literally nothing to gain from keeping it all hush hush, painting Spock as a traitor, have him galavant as a pirate and join (albeit temporarily) the Romulan Empire (he steals a ship and returns to the Enterprise near the end of the book, at which point all is revealed).  Spock admits that actually teaming up with his pirate friend wasn't actually part of the plan... then what was the plan?  Why did they not have Spock's back healed and risk paralysis of a valuable officer and undercover agent?  Why didn't they tell Kirk?!  Additionally, we get much of the narrative from essentially Spock's POV, but even so he never reacts / thinks as if he's aware he's undercover.  I feel like Cooper get's to the end of this big mess and then reaches around for the quickest, simplest way of explaining why Spock went solo for this story, became a pirate, and defected to the Romulan Empire etc.

Strike two!

In essence, don't think about this one too hard.  Black Fire is a romp, it's enjoyable, it's generally well written but it's not one that tries very hard to make sense - even in a Trek way.  Obviously this is a Spock centric story, and a part of me wants to say, the characterisation is good, but the other part of me disagrees because the narrative pushes him in a direction I don't think is natural to the character.  It's like Cooper wants something to happen, forces an action (which isn't normal to the character) but then characterises well when it isn't a plot point.  This kind of goes against some narrative theory I hold quite dear, so I can't quite forgive it for that.

I quite liked Scotty going against the grain and teaming up with Spock to steal a ship though, that was completely in character!

The main 'villains' of the story were quite, strange.  For one thing they had a society based on the fact they bred prolifically on a home planet that couldn't support them.  This resulted in a warlike, suicidal race with next to no respect for life.  They somehow got themselves off their planet and started taking over others... secretly it seems, as nobody else seems to have heard of them previously.  They integrate the technology of the species they subdue with their own, but they do not seem to develop scientifically at all otherwise.  They seemed... I don't know, very unlikely villains especially since they ended up being defeated relatively easily.  This made little sense to me because they were essentially besieged but that was only their home planet, they have scores of other planets as I understand it, why would besieging their dying home planet cause their empire to wave the white flag when socially they are suicidal and have little respect for life?

Strike three!  Black Fire is out! (That's what happens right?)

One of the little furry villains ends up falling in love with Spock *groan*, at least this puts Spock in an uncomfortable position a couple of times.  He deserves it after not being truthful with his space husband Kirk!

I honestly think the lack of exposition from Spock is where the book falls down a bit, it's like Cooper is trying so hard to keep the secret that Spock is undercover that it all comes across a bit disingenuous.  So example, if the narrator is constantly telling us what Spock is thinking and his reasoning, why aren't we made aware that it's all a deception anyway.  Concealing the truth stops us from actually learning the Federation's motivations.  It stops us actually learning what Spock actually thinks / feels about the events, instead we are essentially fed half truths.  Perhaps we should be grateful, it's more information than Kirk gets!

Not wanting to be too much of a stick in the mud, I have to confess that I did enjoy the pirate Spock and his adventures with the Romulan, that section alone was almost worth reading the book for.

Finally, should you read it?  Well... I'm going to give it a solid 3/5.  There's nothing particularly bad about it, but there also isn't anything that really makes me go 'wow' either.  It was just enjoyable, quite silly at times, a little bit melodramatic.  I find some of the TOS novels could plausibly fit in the continuity, Black Fire just doesn't.

3/5 - Ka-boom.

URGH - Just corrected some errors where text was out of place.  It's when I post on my tiny laptop with a touch pad - I'm sorry!

Star Trek Legacies - Captain to Captain

"Right on schedule," Kirk observed.  "I always heard that she was known for her punctuality."
"You heard correctly, Captain," Spock said.  "In my experience, she is admirably precise in all matters."

Ok so, there's kind of a funny story to go with reading this one.  Well, I go away to visit the family for Christmas and then manage to not take a single book with me to their place because my bag with my life in got left at our place.  I was not amused to say the least.   Anyway, after Christmas we went shopping, there happened to be a Waterstone's book store, I went straight to the Scifi section (you know the drill)... and would you look at that, somehow I ended up buying the 50th Anniversary 'Legacies' trilogy.  Considering I have 127 books on their way to me by mail, my partner was not amused... but The Special 50th Anniversary Trilogy hunny!

Before I launch into the review proper, I'm going to clue you up on The Special 50th Anniversary Trilogy (I just like putting it in bold, I get kicks out of strange things) is.  As you can probably guess (unless you are a Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy fan) there are three books in this trilogy (not four)  and they are as follows:

Star Trek Legacies

Book 1 - Captain to Captain by Greg Cox

Book 2 - Best Defence by David Mack

Book 3 - Purgatory's Key by Dayton Ward & Kevin Dilmore

So, we've got a trilogy written by four different authors, not particularly unusual.  If Greg Cox sounds familiar, you may have read one of some of his many Star Trek novels, or you might have read my Child of Two Worlds review.  I've come across the names of the two other authors once or twice before but I don't think I've read anything by them.  I've got to admit, I'm a little disappointed that there are no female authors involved in this project, considering the number of female authors who have written Star Trek novels and how influential female fans have been to Star Trek generally.  Are there no active female authors in the Star Trek novel world at this point in time.  Sorry rambling again.  Anyway, Greg Cox writing the first novel can only be a good thing right?

The Legacies trilogy was initially released from June to August 2016 with the paperback releases running from July to September 2016, all ready for Star Trek's 50th anniversary in September.

For the cover art on all three books they have employed Alan Dingman and used the more 'photographic' or should I say 'photoshop' style for the covers.  I'd say the strongest cover of the three is 'Best Defence' while the weakest unfortunately is 'Captain to Captain'.  The three books are colour coded Captain to Captain is predominantly green, Best Defence is most definitely blue and, Purgatory's Key is... red.  Have you twigged yet?  The original colour for the command uniform was green, science is blue and red is operations / security; they have reflected the uniform colours in the colours of the books.

I have to admit, the cover didn't win me over immediately, although I was intrigued by Number One or 'Una' being on the front next to Kirk and Spock.  I was torn between getting the trilogy and a book with a prettier cover, but as you probably gathered, the trilogy won out in the end.  Probably because book two has a very pretty cover.  You'll notice on this one though, that Number One has got captain's braid on her sleeve, unsurprisingly Miss 'Number One in everything' got busy climbing the ranks in Starfleet.

Being the first book in a trilogy, Cox has a lot more play in how complex a story he can create.  Being a planned trilogy he doesn't have to worry about wrapping the story up in one episode, and certainly doesn't have to worry about tying up any lose ends or returning the universe back to the status quo by the time he types his last word.  This kind of freedom cuts both ways for Cox who has the opportunity to play with a character he really seems to love and get on with but consequently seems to spend a little too much time on her.

Captain to Captain (2016) revolves around a secret, a secret that only the captains of the Enterprise and their trusted first officers have knowledge of.  The secret is a key which has been concealed even from Starfleet and kept on the Starship Enterprise since the time of Captain Robert April (the 'first' Captain of the Enterprise) through to Captain James T Kirk (the 'third' Captain of the Enterprise).  The 'key' is a device that can open a door to another dimension from which a race of technologically advanced but hideously paranoid and genocidal 'slugs' hail.

The officer who first led the mission which ended with sending the 'slugs' back to their dimension and acquisition of this mysterious key?  None other than 'Number One' or 'Una', who is of course Majel Roddenberry's (nee Barrett) character in the original pilot.  In Captain to Captain, Number One is back now as 'Captain Una', on track to being promoted to Commodore Una, she has to act fast to undo mistakes of the past before she is stuck behind a desk and new territorial lines are drawn which may put the Libros system deep in Klingon territory.  Captain Una takes a well considered risk and steals the key from a secret compartment in Kirk's quarters and escapes from the Enterprise and into the Libros system, slingshotting herself around a sun to give herself the edge over a pursuing Enterprise.  At this point I expected some cooky timetravel escapade, but instead I was forced into a walk down memory lane which felt like it was never going to end.   Una's 'adventure' is actually her recollection of the first away mission she lead, which of course went hideously wrong.  For all intents and purposes it really shouldn't have gone wrong, Una is apparently an incredibly able and intelligent Illyrian, but... she's also remarkably dull.  I rather liked Cox's rendition of her in Child of Two Worlds where she is competent and no nonsense, but here she seems stricken with ISS and a strange psychosis where she keeps reminding herself (and us) that she's number one in everything, aside from critical thinking.  Perhaps I'm just suffering from 'Number One' over exposure, since about 80% of the book over concerns itself with her.  Kirk and Spock are on the cover just to reassure us that they will have a part to play eventually.  I have to admit, I don't find young Una a very compelling protagonist.  ANYWAY long story short, her away mission crew get transported into an alternate dimension by the horrible slug people, the secret item is the key for unlocking the stargate device that could bring them home.  Unfortunately, at the time she was unable to manipulate the machinery to bring them back (and she was explicitly told not to by the good slug person), but now, in a nice link to the episode 'Mirror Mirror' and her excellent memory she is confident that she can bring them back, if they are even alive.  After an incredibly protracted sojourn in the past, we return to the present to follow Una again and watch her cock up again until she finally meets up with a waiting Kirk & Spock who finally get some action.   

Predictably, although she can manipulate the machinery, the arrival of the Klingons gives her little time to locate her crew members to bring them back, so she goes into the desolate alternate universe to find them, hoping to bring them back to the right location in 30 days and have Kirk and Spock operate the machinery and bring them home.  Of course, the Klingons are now swarming the place and coming back to the planet seems almost impossible.

Kirk and Spock are then left to their own devices to escape the Klingons, which they do, but not before their ship is irreparably damaged and only get saved by the Enterprise in the nick of time.

Kirk and Spock seal the Key back into the new safe in the Enterprise, and finally let McCoy in on the secret, since not trusting your crew mates /  friends is what got everyone in this mess in the first place.

There's a plot twist right at the end, clearly marked with flashing neon signs.  It's incredibly contrived and irritating.

End of Book 1.

Number One is kind of a problematic character, in that she's this super confident, super able officer and she has apparently always been this way but suffers from the author's attempt to make her young and inexperienced - think what Vonda N McIntyre did to the crew in her abomination 'The First Adventure'.  It was quite surprising actually because Cox's treatment of Number One in Child of Two Worlds was really strong and a really nice expansion of the character.  Cox obviously has a love for the character of Number One and I can see his enthusiasm, but... I can't feel it.  It's unusual but, I didn't dislike the character but I felt a little confused over what she actually was.  Oh sure, I know she's an Illyrian, I know she's outrageously competent, I know she prefers trousers to skirts but I don't know why she has to keep confirming her competence.  I don't think she's arrogant, she just knows she's the best and it's true, but then why does she have to confirm her actions or her intentions or her abilities over and over again with internal dialogue like 'because I'm Number One'?  Is she actually nervous? Neurotic?

I agree that if you are going to use Number One for any length of time then you've got to do something to the character to bring her down to earth, but even with her slight neurosis and hideously stupid mistakes she remains unrelateable - which is a problem when 3/4 of the book concerns itself with her.  Although her idiosyncrasies and illogical actions were at times frustrating, she doesn't spoil the book, I just got the feeling that there was a better was to express her or perhaps a better way for the events to unfold.  Perhaps, for example, it isn't her leading the landing party and she has to fix other people's mistakes but it's too far down the pan for even her outstanding abilities.

I don't want to give too much of the idea that she's a bad character, you might have less of a problem with her than I do, and certainly it's not a bad story by any means. It's just a little weak at times, which I can only really attribute to the prolonged section in the middle with Una (formerly Number One)... and then the prolonged section in Enterprise's 'present' with Una.  I'm Una'd out! 

Pretty much the only interaction with the TOS crew is between Kirk and Spock, McCoy is pretty much written out Captain to Captain pretty early on and other characters are just bit parts.  Even so, characterisation is both good and bad in equal measure.  In the first part of the book, before the story jumps backwards to Number One's first away mission, nothing really jumps out at you as being inconsistent.  Again the focus is on Captain Una and not on the Enterprise crew, interaction is limited to Kirk and Spock exchanging furtive glances and shutting down McCoy's enquiries.  The final section of the book (post Una's departure) details Kirk and Spock's escape was fast paced but also had the most lapses in the characters of Kirk and Spock:

"I think I've had enough of you piloting, no offence"
Spock gave him a bemused look.  "If I had feelings they would be hurt."
"Somehow I doubt that."

Yeah, that face you're pulling?  That's my face too.  I'll make sure we're on the same page with an emoji - 😒 .  The less said about that stirling dialogue the better, yes?

Some reviews I've read for this novel have been glowing, others less so.  For me personally, it was OK, middling, worth reading but nothing special.  I'm still looking forward to the rest of the trilogy though because the story is interesting and I'm also looking forward to seeing what the other three writers are going to bring to the table.  First books in a trilogy are always pretty difficult for writers, especially when they are only writing the first volume, and while I don't agree with other reviewers that the instalment can stand alone, it's merits aren't completely dependant on a follow on story.

3/5 - Time to change pilots.

Hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas and a happy new year!  FYI, I'm in a good, rested mood, I'm not just being mean!  EDIT: Also, I can't seem to spell... ahh well, all fixed!

Star Trek - Double Double

'I have had enough of your insubordination,' he said.  'I have decided to terminate it.'
Spock regarded him, but that was all.  He made no effort to escape. 

Have you got a fear or a dislike that makes you uneasy when you read it in a story?  Something that can turn you off even from a well written book?  For some people it might be violence, or for others it might be gratuitous sex.  For me it's mistaken identity,  specifically the idea of a double fooling those around him and doing things to tarnish the 'original's' reputation.  Perhaps I'm paranoid, perhaps I'm scared that someone might impersonate me someday and nobody notice.  Needless to say, this novel, Double Double (1989) (#45 Pocket, #22 Titan)  by Michael Jan Friedman hits me right in the phobia.

Double Double took me a while to get through, because once I put it down I was afraid to carry on reading.  Afraid because I knew the situation Kirk finds himself in had to get worse before it got better.  Afraid because I had to read about Kirk being powerless and isolated.  I felt so panicked because, nobody of importance did notice the switch.  Nobody made the leap, nobody realised and this frightens me.

I'm jumping ahead I know, but I wanted to make it clear that this isn't a bad book, I think it's a good book, but I just can't divest myself from the unhappy feeling it gives me.  I'm giving it a middling 3/5, I just can't say I enjoyed it... since it gave me such unpleasant feelings.

Double Double is a continuation of the story of 'What Are Little Girls Made Of?'.  It suggests that perhaps, not all the androids were destroyed and one 'Brown' android survived.  The surviving Brown android uses the machine and creates another android from the template remaining in the machine; another android Kirk is created.  Android Kirk then takes control and with the knowledge and characteristics of the real Kirk, formulates plans to achieve 'Korby's' goal of replacing the inhabitants of the entire galaxy with Androids.

Android Kirk's plan is convoluted but clever in a very 'Kirk' way.  First he takes control of the Hood/Dunkirk and replaces a section of the crew with androids, then he implements an elaborate plan to have Kirk kidnapped through a case of mistaken identity, in order for android Kirk to swap places with him.  Once on the Enterprise he starts replicating the crew, but in this case, he doesn't want to kill the 'templates' immediately after using them - something inexplicable - which of course means the Enterprise crew manage to survive for their next outing.  Android Kirk in his arrogance does not factor in the Brown android's disobedience however.  The Brown android seems to have compassionate feelings, and comes to the conclusion that rather than follow Kirk he should lead the other androids to more peaceful ways.

There is also a side story in Double Double which involves Kirk saving the life of a P'othparan who then becomes indebted to Kirk and joins him on the Enterprise.  The catch is that the universal translator has apparently become redundant and unable to adapt to the P'othparan language, despite having an analogue to work from.  Instead, a crew member who has picked up a smattering of the language is the only one who can communicate with the P'othparan boy.  I'm fairly sure that a) Uhura should have been involved in this and b) the universal translator wouldn't take weeks to work out the language.  Why is this side story important?  The P'othparans are empaths, so he is able to identify the androids... shame the universal translator is on the blink so he can't tell people about it!  As it is, he essentially gives members of the Enterprise crew a reason to believe that something is amiss, through some garbled translation.  The P'othparan boy is freed from his bond to Kirk by the end of the book because he has obscurely influenced saving Kirk and the Enterprise.

The rumbling background tension which culminates in a battle which almost sees the Enterprise destroyed (while android Kirk is commanding it and real Kirk is commanding the Hood) is the possibility of hostilities with the Romulans in the sector, so close to the neutral zone.  I actually really liked how the fight played out, it highlighted the faults in the androids, they have difficulty reacting to situations they haven't been in before, despite having all the knowledge their template has.  The fight also had Kirk and Kirk work together to defeat the common enemy, both of them predicting what the other will do.

Android Kirk can't seem to handle the strength of emotion of his template.  While the real Kirk would be able suppress his emotions in order to make the right choices, android Kirk seems to follow his passions without any 'barrier' to his emotions.  Android Kirk has a distinct hatred for Spock as he still retains Kirk's adhoc programming for alerting Spock of the switch in 'What Are Little Girls Made of'.  This intolerance for Spock even carries over to Spock's duplicate, who seems to be reasonable and considerably less emotional than even Spock himself.  Thinking about it, it's quite funny that the Kirk duplicate is as unreasonable as his evil twin from 'Mirror Mirror' and Spock's android pretty much reflects the moderate character of mirror universe Spock.  It's seems sad though to think that the right conditions for a good 'Captain Kirk' are so marginal and he's so easily skewed in other circumstances - he's a terrifying villain.  I'd also like to have seen more from the android Spock's perspective as I think that would have been really interesting, I mean, he would have had all the memories of Spock including knowing about the programming Kirk did when the android was created AND (dare I say it) feelings of friendship still.

Naturally there is a fight between Kirk and Kirk which is altogether too satisfying and which you will have to read for yourself.  Needless to say RIP Kirk's shirt.


I think there is an editing error in the novel which could cause some confusion.  The blurb on the back of the novel will refer to the U.S.S Dunkirk (yes, very funny 'dark Kirk') but the starship actually involved from the beginning of the novel is the Hook, this ship then changes names to Dunkirk further in and then back to the Hook again.  The blurb at the back also names the ship 'Dunkirk', I think there was some editing confusion somewhere...

Double Double illustrates a few points rather well.  Firstly, that Kirk would be a terrifying villain, secondly, that there are far too few people in Starfleet who can think outside the box (including Kirk's own crew) and lastly that Kirk shouldn't go on shore leave, ever, especially when there could well be alcohol involved.  I was completely dismayed that none of his crew noticed the swap - including Spock, who notices inconsistencies but then just ignores them on the basis that it was more of a 'feeling' than a logical conclusion.  I'm fairly sure that Kirk would have felt dismayed and hurt too that his crew just accepted his crazy orders and not made anything of it.  Urgh, I can feel the anxiety rising up again!  I had to laugh though about Kirk's shore leave going wrong again, bless him, he takes his crew to a favourite dive and it all goes wrong.  I hope he does actually manage to have a thoroughly uneventful and relaxing shore leave at some point!

All in all, I recommend reading Double Double as long as you don't get too anxious like I do!  I think it's a relatively good tie in story, although it does have some nonsensical elements to it, which I think could be avoided with just a little bit of thought and guidance from an editor - on the other hand a starship keeps changing names, so perhaps I am expecting too much?

3/5 - I'd know it wasn't you, Kirk!